Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mark HPB support as BROKEN

Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-26T18:27:27Z

James,

> I was hoping the HPB guys would do this.

Yes, that would be great. Easier to validate for someone with access to
the hardware in question.

> Agreed, that was my initial proposed solution: get rid of the write
> buffer optimzation now to fix the API abuse and see if we can add it
> back in a more acceptable form later.

Doesn't matter to me whether we back out the 2.0 stuff or mark it as
broken. I merely objected to reverting all of HPB since I don't think
that would solve anything.

But obviously we'll need a patch to fix 5.15 ASAP...

--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering