From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:33073 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752272AbcHLU0u (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:26:50 -0400 To: Tom Yan Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Shaun Tancheff , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Shaun Tancheff Subject: Re: [RFC] sd: dynamically adjust SD_MAX_WS16_BLOCKS as per the actual logical block size From: "Martin K. Petersen" References: Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:26:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Tom Yan's message of "Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:52:57 +0800") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Yan writes: Tom, Tom> I don't really follow. What would this BLK_MAX_BIO_SECTORS be? It Tom> doesn't appear to me that a static value is going to address the Tom> problem I am addressing in this patch. 0x7fffff, the maximum number of block layer sectors that can be expressed in a single bio. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering