Re: [Bluez-devel] sbc and fixed-point progress

Victor Shcherbatyuk
2005-08-24T21:06:15Z

Brad,

Are you sure you've comitted the change? Cause all usleep's are still 10 and
I've checked out just a minute ago.

Regards,
Victor.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brad Midgley" <bmidgley@xmission.com>
To: <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 18:40
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] sbc and fixed-point progress

> Victor,
>
> That's good news, glad to hear.
>
> I thought itimer used the rtc behind the scenes but maybe we need to try
> latching into the rtc directly for our timing. It's insane to have to
> tweak.
>
> Can you tell me if the sources you tested used the new usleep value? I
> committed a change to use 1000 in that first usleep call but you may not
> have updated and gotten it.
>
> Brad
>
> Victor Shcherbatyuk wrote:
>> Brad,
>>
>> I ran one more test and instead of -n flag for a2play I changed magic 87
>> to magic 50, CPU usage dropped >2 times to ~8% on ARM9@400Mhz and sound
>> is still smooth. That's how it was tested in first place which is close
>> to 30 MIPS I guess...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Victor.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle
> Practices
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> Bluez-devel mailing list
> Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel