From: "Daryl Van Vorst" <daryl@wideray.com>
To: "'Marcel Holtmann'" <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: "'BlueZ Mailing List'" <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [Bluez-devel] Alignment issue
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:44:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001201c47fc2$7093e4a0$1301010a@baked> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092208405.4564.227.camel@pegasus>
Marcel,
Actually just using memmove instead of memcpy was the first thing I tried
that worked. Someone else here suggested that.
But I thought I read somewhere that the compiler is allowed to optimize
memmove in the same way. Though I don't know if gcc ever does (and
apparently it doesn't in this case). But if it is allowed to, then some
future version of gcc may. Perhaps I misread it.
-Daryl.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of
> Marcel Holtmann
> Sent: August 11, 2004 12:13 AM
> To: Daryl Van Vorst
> Cc: 'BlueZ Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Alignment issue
>
>
> Hi Daryl,
>
> > The attached patch should fix the problem (it does as far
> as I can tell).
> > The compiler probably thinks both arguments to memcpy() are
> aligned and so
> > makes an optimization which breaks the copy (because the
> destination is not
> > actually aligned). Perhaps this is a compiler bug... I'm
> using gcc 3.3.3.
> > After googling and reading some discussion on the topic it
> seems that it's
> > probably not a compiler bug. I'll leave that for someone
> else to decide. :)
>
> after checking some more resources, you may be right and the compiler
> optimizes here where it should not. I found a comment about gcc and
> using its __builtin_memcpy. Try to replace the memcpy with memmove and
> see if this works.
>
> --- bluetooth.h 2004/07/04 15:38:11 1.14
> +++ bluetooth.h 2004/08/11 07:07:12 1.15
> @@ -93,10 +93,10 @@ enum {
> #define bt_put_unaligned(val, ptr) ((void)( *(ptr) = (val) ))
> #else
> #define bt_get_unaligned(ptr) \
> - ({ __typeof__(*(ptr)) __tmp; memcpy(&__tmp, (ptr),
> sizeof(*(ptr))); __tmp; })
> + ({ __typeof__(*(ptr)) __tmp; memmove(&__tmp, (ptr),
> sizeof(*(ptr))); __tmp; })
> #define bt_put_unaligned(val, ptr) \
> ({ __typeof__(*(ptr)) __tmp = (val); \
> - memcpy((ptr), &__tmp, sizeof(*(ptr))); \
> + memmove((ptr), &__tmp, sizeof(*(ptr))); \
> (void)0; })
> #endif
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
> Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Bluez-devel mailing list
> Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-11 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 18:38 [Bluez-devel] Alignment issue Daryl Van Vorst
2004-08-10 23:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-11 9:20 ` Stephen Crane
2004-08-11 11:08 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-11 19:33 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-11 7:13 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-11 16:44 ` Daryl Van Vorst [this message]
2004-08-11 19:31 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 8:34 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 9:27 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 10:01 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 10:22 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 10:35 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 11:00 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 11:33 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 11:49 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 12:02 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 12:29 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 13:36 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-13 8:07 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-13 9:05 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-13 9:14 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-13 11:52 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-13 12:40 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 12:53 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-13 9:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-13 10:56 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 10:10 ` Stephen Crane
2004-08-12 10:25 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-20 14:30 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-20 14:45 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-20 14:59 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-20 18:14 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-21 8:26 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-23 8:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-23 11:39 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-23 12:29 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-23 14:40 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-23 15:11 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-23 15:22 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-23 23:16 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-16 9:48 john smith
2004-08-16 10:15 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001201c47fc2$7093e4a0$1301010a@baked' \
--to=daryl@wideray.com \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox