From: Stephen Crane <steve.crane@rococosoft.com>
To: marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de, maxk@qualcomm.com
Cc: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: New BlueZ Security Manager
Date: 05 Mar 2003 13:46:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1046871982.2860.1155.camel@baroque.rococosoft.com> (raw)
Hi Marcel, Max,
On Marcel's German slides (for which I've lost the link) I noticed a
revamped security manager on the TODO list. However I don't ever
remember seeing a discussion about it here on the list. I'd like to
kick-start this discussion if possible.
The main thing wrong with hcid (in my opinion) is what the security
white-paper (http://www.bluetooth.com/upload/24Security_Paper.PDF)
defines as support for security mode 2. This is where the
owning-application enforces the security requirements for a service.
The difference between this and the current setup (security modes 1 and
3 in the whitepaper's terminology) is (I think) that hcid enforces
permissions at the ACL level whereas service-level security takes place
/after/ the ACL link is already up. It should be possible to allow SDP
searches for example, but deny access to services discovered through
SDP.
I don't think that the current kernel API is rich enough to permit this.
It ought to be possible for a server listening on a socket to discover
the BDADDR of the connecting peer and either accept() or reject access
--- probably through an ioctl(). On the client-side, a special error
return from (or argument to) connect() could indicate that a PIN was
required to connect.
Thoughts?
Steve
--
Stephen Crane, Rococo Software Ltd. http://www.rococosoft.com
steve.crane@rococosoft.com +353-1-6601315 (ext 209)
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-05 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-05 13:46 Stephen Crane [this message]
2003-03-05 15:52 ` [Bluez-devel] Re: New BlueZ Security Manager Marcel Holtmann
2003-03-06 23:10 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-03-06 23:02 ` [Bluez-devel] " Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1046871982.2860.1155.camel@baroque.rococosoft.com \
--to=steve.crane@rococosoft.com \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox