From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: Daryl Van Vorst <daryl@wideray.com>
Cc: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Bluez-devel] Re: Qualification testing - rfcomm
Date: 11 Jul 2003 10:55:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1057913731.1027.11.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001501c3457d$18b63a10$1a01010a@baked>
Hi Daryl,
> Finally got some results on those latest rfcomm changes for qualification.
> Looks like there are a few more problems. :( But we're close. :)
>
> TP/RFC/BV-09-C:
> "Verify that the IUT handles flow control correctly when the Tester, acting
> as a device conforming to Bluetooth version 1.0B, controls the data flow
> using the Modem Status Command. The IUT's device role is of no importance."
>
> The command and console output:
>
> root@jack-00000000:~>./rctest -s -P 1 -b 20 00:A0:96:1F:83:71
> rctest[351]: Connected
> rctest[351]: Sending ...
> rctest[351]: Send failed. Resource temporarily unavailable(11)
>
> The IUT sends data in 5 frames, then stops for aboue 20s, then sends 5 more,
> then stops, etc. Technically, this test passed because we did stop sending
> data after the tester send MSC stop to the IUT. But something's clearly not
> right.
this looks quite right, but the rctest program don't check the error
code. If it receives EAGAIN it should try again, but it aborts.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-11 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-08 18:16 Qualification testing - rfcomm Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-08 21:47 ` [Bluez-devel] " James Courtier-Dutton
2003-07-08 23:23 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-18 19:35 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2003-07-11 8:18 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2003-07-22 16:23 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-07-22 16:46 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-07-22 17:40 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-07-22 19:13 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-07-22 16:48 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-22 16:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-07-22 17:01 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-11 8:55 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2003-07-11 16:43 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-11 19:05 ` [Bluez-devel] " Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-18 18:53 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-18 18:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-07-18 19:07 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-18 19:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-07-18 19:19 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-22 17:09 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-07-22 18:13 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-22 19:43 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-07-22 16:26 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-07-18 19:30 ` [Bluez-devel] " James Courtier-Dutton
2003-07-18 20:25 ` Daryl Van Vorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1057913731.1027.11.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=daryl@wideray.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox