Hi Daryl,

> > > @@ -1533,6 +1591,9 @@
> > >  	struct list_head *p, *n;
> > > 
> > >  	BT_DBG("session %p state %ld", s, s->state);
> > > +
> > > +	if (test_bit(RFCOMM_TX_THROTTLED, &s->flags))
> > > +		return;
> > > 
> > >  	list_for_each_safe(p, n, &s->dlcs) {
> > >  		d = list_entry(p, struct rfcomm_dlc, list);
> > This part is not ok. We still have to check for timeout. Rest 
> > of patch is fine.
> 
> Ok. I'll see if it's not too late to stop testing it. :)

it should not make any difference for the test case, but here is the
complete version of the new patch.

Regards

Marcel