From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Bluez-devel] Re: L2CAP non-blocking socket nasty race conditions
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 08:17:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1075879044.13285.151.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040204015825.GA2217@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
Hi Jean,
> I've just managed to reproduce and track a few bug that so far
> were escaping me. There is a race condition in the accept() code for
> non-blocking L2CAP sockets, and a similar one in sendmsg. Or maybe
> it's just that my code is too fast ;-)
do you have a simple test code to reproduce it?
> This is the accept race :
> 1) L2CAP socket in non blocking mode, because program waiting
> on multiple outputs.
> 2) Wait on socket to be readable with poll/select.
> 3) When socket is ready, accept() it and do what we have to do.
> 4) When the race occur, accept() return an error (EAGAIN).
> 5) We don't touch the socket and go back to poll/select.
> 6) Poll/select returns immediately (socket is still readable).
> 7) We attempt the accept(), EAGAIN, goto (5)
Is this an endless loop? Or do accept() succeeds after some time?
BTW why must a listen socket non-blocking? The listen() command itself
doesn't block and I don't see any need for a non-blocking listen socket.
> I didn't managed to fully identify the sendmsg race, but I
> goes like this :
> 1) Open L2CAP socket in non blocking mode, because program
> waiting on multiple outputs.
> 2) Connect to BT peer.
> 3) Wait on socket to be writeable with poll/select.
> 4) When socket is ready, sendmsg() and do what we have to do.
> 5) When the race occur, sendmsg() return an error (ENOTCONN).
> ...
>
> I looked at way to fix the code, but it's not a quick fix and
> there is multiple way to attack the problem. So, if one of you could
> have a look at it...
Is this on a listen/accepted socket or is this a simple connection?
> Below you will find a self explanatory log of the kernel
> showing the problem with accept. The first accept was successful (no
> problem), the second one was racy.
>>From the logfile function names I assume this is a 2.6 kernel. Do you
see the same behaviour on 2.4?
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-04 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-04 1:58 L2CAP non-blocking socket nasty race conditions Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-04 7:17 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2004-02-04 17:58 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-04 19:58 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-04 21:45 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-05 1:00 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-05 1:11 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-05 1:30 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-05 1:40 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-05 2:21 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-05 2:26 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-05 2:36 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-05 2:42 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-05 3:30 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-05 13:49 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-05 17:19 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-05 18:17 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-05 23:13 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-05 23:37 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-05 23:43 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-04 11:23 ` [Bluez-devel] bluez & qos Mauro Tortonesi
2004-02-04 11:36 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-04 17:46 ` [Bluez-devel] " Jean Tourrilhes
2004-02-05 10:46 ` Mauro Tortonesi
2004-02-05 17:22 ` Jean Tourrilhes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1075879044.13285.151.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox