From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: "Marc-André Laverdière" <m_laverd@alcor.concordia.ca>
Cc: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Major slowdown when service discovery+opening a service happens on two systems trying to talk to each other
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:14:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1077318893.1433.6.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1077309735.4036712706cd0@alcor.concordia.ca>
Hi Marc-Andre,
> Here's the situation in more Bluetooth-compliant terms:
> Configuration:
> Belkin FT0003 USB dongles
> RedHat 9 with kernel 2.4.28, from RedHat
> Running with latest released versions of BlueZ
> Running Impronto 1.18
> Running Java SDK 1.4.2.3
I can't tell you anything about the Java part, but the kernel version
that you are using don't exists ;)
> Bluetooth activity (all happening in Java):
>
> Implicit: Inquiry Scan [device is set as GIAC]
> Thread 1: Inquiry [aka Device Discovery] [runs perpetually, with some sleeping
> between each iteration]
> Thread 2: Page Scan [opening a service and waiting for clients with
> acceptAndOpen()]
> Thread 3: SDP Paging + Connection [Service Discovery] [does so when new devices
> are found, could happen anytime. Sleeps most of the time]
> Thread 4: Paging + Connection [L2CAP Connection as a slave] [happens at user's
> input]
>
> Computer A and Computer B are running this configuration
> Planned Test:
> Start program on both computers
> Wait for both Computer A and Computer B to discover each other via Inquiry
> User prompts Computer A to send a message to Computer B [creating a L2CAP
> connection]
> Computer B reads the message and closes the connection
> Both shut down their services and exit cleanly
>
> What happens:
> Inconsistent behaviour. Service discovery can happen promptly on Computer A and
> never finish on Computer B. Sometimes, service discovery completes around 20
> seconds for both systems.
> The L2CAP connection may not establish itself. Behaviour varies at every test's
> run, but generally the results look like a deadlock has occured somewhere.
> Very low Bluetooth performance compared to the speed of other configurations.
>
> I hope this makes more sense. I have to read more about the Bluetooth spec, see
> what I'm doing wrong Bluetooth-wise. Any sections particularly?
The problem that I see is that if device A runs an inquiry and device B
tries to page device A at the same time, this will fail. But this is a
topic for baseband experts and not for me. You can try to disable page
scan before you run an inquiry and re-enable it when your are finished.
Same goes for the inquiry scan.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-20 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-15 1:20 [Bluez-users] Major slowdown when service discovery+opening a service happens on two systems trying to talk to each other Marc-Andre Laverdiere-Papineau
2004-02-15 14:31 ` Marcel Holtmann
[not found] ` <1076900027.403030bbba48f@alcor.concordia.ca>
2004-02-16 8:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-16 20:17 ` Marc-Andre Laverdiere-Papineau
2004-02-17 12:52 ` Marcel Holtmann
[not found] ` <1077033023.4032383f0b3d3@alcor.concordia.ca>
2004-02-17 16:10 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-02-20 20:42 ` Marc-André Laverdière
2004-02-20 23:14 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1077318893.1433.6.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=m_laverd@alcor.concordia.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox