From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.demon.co.uk>
Cc: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Questions about correctness of hci_usb sco support.
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:07:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1077973622.2843.75.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403F8EAC.40701@superbug.demon.co.uk>
Hi James,
> In hci_usb.c file, line 604 ish
> static inline int __recv_frame(struct hci_usb *husb, int type, void
> *data, int count)
>
> Contains: -
> case HCI_SCODATA_PKT:
> if (count >= HCI_SCO_HDR_SIZE) {
> struct hci_sco_hdr *h = data;
> len = HCI_SCO_HDR_SIZE + h->dlen;
> } else
> return -EILSEQ;
> break;
>
> With a SCO HCI packet, it lasts 3 air frames for a bluetooth headset.
> How do we know that the first frame we receive from the usb bluetooth
> device is the SCO HCI header?
if (!skb) {
/* Start of the frame */
> What happens if the first SCO HCI frame we receive is actually the
> second or third frame in the SCO HCI packet ?
> Surely some validation checks need to be done.
> For example, depending on the sample format we are using, we should
> already know what the SCO HCI length should be, so we could check this
> against the length in the SCO HCI header, and only accept the frame if
> they match, if they don't match, drop the frame, and wait for the next
> frame.
> I would expect similar problems with HCI int/bulk frames, but I don't
> actually see any corrupt int/bulk frames, so I was wondering whether the
> usb bluetooth dongle somehow ensures that the first air frame we receive
> is actually the start of an HCI frame. Maybe it is just luck, as
> int/bulk frames normally have a lot of blank invalid frames in between,
> so maybe as soon as it sees a valid frame, it is always the start of the
> int/bulk frame. I don't think we can make this assumtion all the time,
> in case we start filling the air entirely with bulk frames, and some air
> frames get lost. We will have to drop the hci frame, and then resync
> when the next hci frame arrives.
I actually don't get your point, because the USB INT, BULK and ISOC
URB's has nothing to do with the frames on the air. It is the HCI of the
Bluetooth chip.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-28 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-27 18:38 [Bluez-devel] Questions about correctness of hci_usb sco support James Courtier-Dutton
2004-02-28 13:07 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2004-02-29 2:38 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2004-02-29 2:42 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1077973622.2843.75.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=James@superbug.demon.co.uk \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox