From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] (no subject) From: Marcel Holtmann To: Geert Geurts Cc: BlueZ Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1080503792.10768.4.camel@geert.ebm.nl> References: <1080503792.10768.4.camel@geert.ebm.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1080505664.2281.132.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:27:44 +0200 Hi Geert, > I've been working to get my palm to connect using bluetooth.... > Guess wat my problem was... I had the affix drivers also > installed/loaded ....ughh... yea stupid wanker I know. I've got it > working using affix (sorry, It started to work faster...)now, anyways > why should I swich to bluez?? I know if I don't want to I don't have to > but putting it in a other way why is bluez part of the kernel and not > affix? BlueZ is the official Linux Bluetooth stack and it is a well written and designed Bluetooth stack. Look at my slides from http://www.holtmann.org/papers/bluetooth/wtc2003_slides.pdf and search the one which compares the mailing list activity of both. You can decide by yourself why BlueZ is part of the kernel and why Affix is not. If it comes to the source code, the supported protocols & profiles and hardware drivers BlueZ always wins. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users