From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Stefan Mischke <survivor@uni-paderborn.de>
Cc: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] L2CAP: One failing connection hurts others?
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:34:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095186861.5695.193.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41470C59.2050909@uni-paderborn.de>
Hi Stefan,
> I'm observing the following issue: I have 3 BT devices. 2 in listening
> state, the 3rd is connecting to both of them repeatingly via L2CAP
> (polling some data). If one of the listening devices is almost of the
> range and makes connection attempts fail, this also causes the
> connection attempts to the other device (which is good in range) to fail
> with errno 16 "Device or ressource busy". The (almost) out of range
> device fails as expected with errno 110 "Connection timed out" (since I
> set a timeout) or 112 "Host is down".
>
> Now my question: Is there a way to circumvent this errno 16, so that I
> can further connect to in range devices even if one device is getting
> out of range and thus producing errors? What makes L2CAP failing with
> errno 16? How can I prevent it?
run "hcidump -x" as root and show us the problematic parts. What kind of
dongles are you using? Do you changed any of hcid.conf settings or do
you set the master/rswitch on the listening L2CAP socket?
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: thawte's Crypto Challenge Vl
Crack the code and win a Sony DCRHC40 MiniDV Digital Handycam
Camcorder. More prizes in the weekly Lunch Hour Challenge.
Sign up NOW http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;10740251;10262165;m
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-14 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-14 15:20 [Bluez-devel] L2CAP: One failing connection hurts others? Stefan Mischke
2004-09-14 18:34 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2004-09-14 19:11 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-14 19:24 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-14 19:37 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-14 19:49 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-14 20:10 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-14 21:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-14 23:37 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-15 7:46 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-15 14:00 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-15 21:09 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-15 22:26 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-16 10:30 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-16 10:34 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-16 10:39 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-16 11:00 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-16 11:10 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-16 16:41 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-15 20:37 ` Stefan Mischke
2004-09-15 21:06 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-15 22:13 ` Stefan Mischke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1095186861.5695.193.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=survivor@uni-paderborn.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox