From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Student query: a question about multihop From: Marcel Holtmann To: libo Cc: BlueZ Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20041019184254.31606ee9.libo@semit.com.cn> References: <34204.81.199.88.27.1098106921.squirrel@ucu.ac.ug> <1098107316.21553.8.camel@pegasus> <20041019184254.31606ee9.libo@semit.com.cn> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1098183402.24465.0.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:56:43 +0200 Hi, > +---------+ > | GN | > +---------+ > / \ > / \ > / \ > / \ > +--------+ +--------+ > | PANU 1 | | PANU 2| > +--------+ +--------+ > I did as the HOWTO-PAN.txt said. > GN connect with PANU1 with bnep0 and PANU1 with bnep1. I have to allocate IPs for both of bnep0 (10.0.0.1) and bnep1 (10.0.1.1), thus PANU1 (10.0.0.2) and PANU2 (10.0.1.2) are in different subnet, and they can not ping each other. > I may have done something wrong. It is unrealistic to allocate IP for each bnep if there are more PANUs connect to the GN. I think there must be a better way to let those PANUs in the same subnet, and one can access the other through GN easily. there is an easier way. Use bridging. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users