From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Bluez-devel] Re: out of range
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:15:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1105571707.7961.152.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050112212555.GA5572@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
Hi Jean,
> > I had your patch in my -mh patches for some time, but then it got out of
> > sync with the mainline development and I dropped it. However I want your
> > patch inside the kernel, but I still don't like the way of notification.
> > What do you think about setting sk->sk_err with an error code like we do
> > for the reliable feature that detects ACL packet errors. Even if the HCI
> > events itself are global I like to do the notification through the
> > socket interfaces of L2CAP and RFCOMM. Comments?
>
> I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the sk->sk_err stuff. My
> assumption is that a write/read would return the error. Yep, I think
> that would be much simpler/smoother/straightforward for most
> applications, as most applications don't open HCI sockets.
my neither, but Max introduced it for the L2CAP reliable check that was
needed for the Bluetooth qualification. I think we can also use it for
detecting ACL stalls or the reason why a connection is terminated.
> However, I was personally using this feature with BNEP sockets
> (i.e. monitoring PAN), and pand doesn't do any read/write on the L2CAP
> socket once the BNEP connection is established. So, in this case, the
> HCI event makes more sense.
I don't know if select() or poll() also returns the error value from
sk->sk_err, but if then this is maybe a nice way and we can keep the
handling inside the application without the need of root rights for the
special HCI events.
Anyone who volunteers for writing a patch for it?
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-12 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-12 18:38 Re: out of range Jean Tourrilhes
2005-01-12 20:32 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-12 21:25 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2005-01-12 23:15 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1105571707.7961.152.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox