Hi Albert,
I have made the changes as you suggest. In future, it would probably be
just as easy for you to send patches, right?

Thanks,
Steve

On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 03:48 -0500, Albert Huang wrote:
> it appears that the internal documentation for sdp_record_register is
> also incorrect.
> 
> libs/src/sdp.c:2288
>  *
>  * Returns a non-null value (a pointer) to a service
>  * record if successful, else -1 setting errno
>  */
> 
> I think it should read something like:
>  *
>  * Returns zero if successful, also setting rec->handle 
>  * else -1 setting erro
>  */
> 
> You may also want to update libs/include/sdp_lib.h to indicate the
> behavior of sdp_record_register
> 
> Regards,
> Albert
> 
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:20:38 +0000, Stephen Crane
> <steve.crane@rococosoft.com> wrote:
> > Hi Albert, Marcel,
> > 
> > The documentation is incorrect: the correct behaviour of
> > sdp_service_search_req() is that it returns a list of service record
> > handles --- you then use sdp_search_attr_req() to fetch attributes of
> > interest. Alternatively, you can use sdp_search_attr_req() to perform a
> > combined search.
> > 
> > I have fixed the comment in CVS.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Steve
> > 
> > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 09:34 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > > Hi Albert,
> > >
> > > > the documentation for sdp_service_search_req() states that it outputs
> > > > an sdp_list_t * of sdp_record_t * (list of sdp service records)
> > > >
> > > > reading through the code, it appears that it actually returns a list
> > > > of uint32_t * data structures.
> > > >
> > > > line 2721:
> > > >         extract_record_handle_seq(pdata, rsp, rec_count, &scanned);
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > line 2523:
> > > > static void extract_record_handle_seq(char *pdu, sdp_list_t **seq, int
> > > > count, int *scanned)
> > > > {
> > > >     sdp_list_t *pSeq = *seq;
> > > >     char *pdata = pdu;
> > > >     int n;
> > > >
> > > >     for (n = 0; n < count; n++) {
> > > >         uint32_t *pSvcRec = (uint32_t *) malloc(sizeof(uint32_t));
> > > >         *pSvcRec = ntohl(bt_get_unaligned((uint32_t *) pdata));
> > > >         pSeq = sdp_list_append(pSeq, pSvcRec);
> > > >         pdata += sizeof(uint32_t);
> > > >         *scanned += sizeof(uint32_t);
> > > >     }
> > > >     *seq = pSeq;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > I think this will cause segfaults when you try to sdp_record_free the
> > > > records in the list (it does for me).
> > > >
> > > > perhaps it shold read something more like:
> > > >         sdp_record_t *pSvcRec = (sdp_record_t*) malloc(sizeof(sdp_record_t));
> > > >         pSvcRec->attrlist = pSvcRec->pattern = 0;
> > > >         pSvcRec->handle = ntohl(bt_get_unaligned((uint32_t *) pdata));
> > > >         pSeq = sdp_list_append(pSeq, pSvcRec);
> > >
> > > Steve, any thoughts on this one?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Marcel
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bluez-devel mailing list
> > Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
> >