From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] SBC Decoder Performance
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:12:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133133156.13629.45.camel@blade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <438A3135.6080208@xmission.com>
Hi Brad,
> >>bunch of macro calls that are replaced at compile time by either
> >>floating or fixed point math.
> >
> > but this is totally ugly.
>
> the macros are also how the inline arm assembly gets inserted, so there
> are potentially a bunch of implementation for each macro, especially
> since 32-bit fixed is still experimental:
>
> - floating
> - 64-bit fixed generic
> - arm 64-bit asm
> - 32-bit fixed generic
> - arm 32-bit asm
>
> it's ugly, but what should it look like? it doesn't look much better by
> removing floating from the list.
I haven't looked through the complete code, but these #ifdef all over
the place are ugly. They should be avoided whenever possible.
> > If the fixed point decoder is too slow, then this needs to be fixed.
> > Having too decoders won't really help.
>
> inline asm may help but the difference is probably in the noise level.
If possible I would avoid any assembler at all. However it would be at
least something to try.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-27 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-18 6:27 [Bluez-devel] SBC Decoder Performance Joe Samuel
2005-10-18 7:35 ` Brad Midgley
2005-11-27 15:34 ` Brad Midgley
2005-11-27 18:31 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-11-27 21:19 ` Brad Midgley
2005-11-27 21:51 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-11-27 22:20 ` Brad Midgley
2005-11-27 23:12 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2005-12-02 23:13 ` Brad Midgley
2005-12-03 5:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-18 12:22 Joe Samuel
2005-10-18 15:46 ` Brad Midgley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1133133156.13629.45.camel@blade \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).