From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] SBC Decoder Performance
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:17:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133587030.31106.15.camel@blade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4390D50F.9020208@xmission.com>
Hi Brad,
> > it's ugly, but what should it look like? it doesn't look much better by
> > removing floating from the list.
>
> Unfortunately I've been noticing a difference in quality between fixed
> and floating. It is subtle, but high-frequency content is harsh and a
> little distorted with the fixed point encoder. I could encode some
> violin notes if you want to hear the difference.
no need to. I believe you if you say so. Anyhow I still think that there
is no need to keep a floating point encoder/decoder.
> It would be nice to implement the objective quality measures suggested
> by Steven Singer so we could track this down more that's another thing
> on the todo list for now.
Keep up the good work.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-03 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-18 6:27 [Bluez-devel] SBC Decoder Performance Joe Samuel
2005-10-18 7:35 ` Brad Midgley
2005-11-27 15:34 ` Brad Midgley
2005-11-27 18:31 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-11-27 21:19 ` Brad Midgley
2005-11-27 21:51 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-11-27 22:20 ` Brad Midgley
2005-11-27 23:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-12-02 23:13 ` Brad Midgley
2005-12-03 5:17 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-18 12:22 Joe Samuel
2005-10-18 15:46 ` Brad Midgley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1133587030.31106.15.camel@blade \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).