From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: Mingfan lu In-Reply-To: <20060621085014.80178.qmail@web15802.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> References: <20060621085014.80178.qmail@web15802.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:59:50 +0200 Message-Id: <1150880390.3950.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: BlueZ development Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] =?utf-8?b?5Zue5aSN77yaIFJlOiDlm57lpI3vvJogUmU6ICBS?= =?utf-8?b?Re+8miBSRTogRldE77yaIFJlOiBSZTpSZXF1ZXN0IHdpdGgJUlNTSQ==?= Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi, > I can't understand your test , why you set the mode 5? > what is the relation between your result and the problem? it means that they support the inquiry mode command, but don't do actually anything with it. Setting it to 5 is not allowed. So this command should fail and later on it should retrieve only 0 or 1 as valid values, but it doesn't. This leads to the conclusion that they only store the inquiry mode value somewhere, but never evaluate it. And this means they will never switch to Inquiry with RSSI as you have seen before. Regards Marcel > _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel