From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ users In-Reply-To: References: <1151066205.6247.19.camel@addu> <1151324247.7694.10.camel@localhost> <1151334192.29221.7.camel@addu> <1151336865.7694.37.camel@localhost> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:21:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1151342500.7694.40.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] L2CAP MTU and packet fragmentation? Reply-To: BlueZ users List-Id: BlueZ users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Stephen, > > If you actually use L2CAP data channel with SOCK_SEQPACKET then you > > won't see a loss at all. It is a reliable channel. > > Yeah, this is what I'm doing, but I'm seeing loss. > > I'm following the code from http://people.csail.mit.edu/albert/bluez-intro/x556.html, but not fiddling with anything related to unreliability in section 4.3.2. > > Trying the same between two different machines gets me the reliable data transfer. > > Am I dealing with bad hardware here? Hardware with bad drivers (I'm dealing with Bluetooth built into a HP iPaq running Familiar Linux, kernel version 2.6.12)? Or an out of date bluez-utils (bluez-utils-nodbus package is version 2.14-r4)? you can't see loss on the L2CAP data channel. This is impossible. Regards Marcel Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users