From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Bastien Nocera To: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: <1200511043.7978.65.camel@aeonflux> References: <1200489349.26259.29.camel@cookie.hadess.net> <1200497567.7978.51.camel@aeonflux> <1200497718.26259.38.camel@cookie.hadess.net> <1200498238.7978.59.camel@aeonflux> <1200498782.26259.41.camel@cookie.hadess.net> <1200511043.7978.65.camel@aeonflux> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:28:15 +0000 Message-Id: <1200511695.26259.56.camel@cookie.hadess.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] Ignore built files Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:17 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > > > I don't see the need and especially since the long-term goal is to move > > > to git, it will become useless. > > > > I thought we wanted to move bluez-gnome to GNOME's SVN... > > personally I think that Subversion is as worse as CVS and I don't see > any advantage for a switch to that. Convincing me that GNOME's > infrastructure makes sense is different, but from a pure technical > standpoint of the SCM, Subversion is not an argument I am gonna buy > into. I'm not getting into SCM discussions, if GNOME was still using CVS, I'd still be using CVS (and so forth). What I meant was using the GNOME infrastructure to get translators, documentation writers, and plenty of pairs of eyeballs for the code. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel