From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: <8a8adccc0802100924m58527440rcd3d6ffb062c742@mail.gmail.com> References: <8a8adccc0802100701y384d23f6oeb12c7a8d0fe4f83@mail.gmail.com> <1202659315.7664.88.camel@violet> <8a8adccc0802100831k107d6d0akc0cfe388b61b7810@mail.gmail.com> <1202661736.7664.91.camel@violet> <8a8adccc0802100924m58527440rcd3d6ffb062c742@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:52:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1202665966.7664.97.camel@violet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] Use new tango icon for bluez gnome Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Jaap, > > > > > Andreas Nilson has made new tango icons for bluez-gnome. (The > > > > > stock_bluetooth icon will be removed from gnome-icon-theme, because > > > > > it's deprecated) > > > > > > > > do icons really should belong in the package itself. I was under the > > > > impression that it is better to have them in a common package and the > > > > applications are going to reference them only. I am happy to follow the > > > > GNOME policy here, but someone has to tell me what is the current way to > > > > go for these. > > > > > > The GNOME policy is that only the icons of the icon naming > > > specification [1] will be in gnome icon theme. Apps have to ship there > > > own icons. > > > > why don't we make the Bluetooth icons then part of the icon naming > > specification? > > > > I agree with you that it makes sense, but Rodney Dawes the icon naming > spec and gnome icon theme maintainer thinks it doesn't make sense. See > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505116 > I've tried to convince him several times of including some icons, but > he's very keen on keeping the icon set as minimal as possible. You can > try if you want. I don't even bother. Eventually they change their mind back and I am not getting in their way. I couldn't care less. > > I would like to do it all in one run. Since we depend now on the > > notifications, we can actually better use the blinking capability and > > create better visibility for the end user. > > > > Ask Andreas how long it would take. I am not an graphics guy at all. So > > I would have no clue. > > > > You could do me a favor by applying the patch. Now and then I have to > feel that the time I put in patches is appreciated. > > Patches have the tendency not to apply cleanly anymore after a while > and thus lead to more work. > > Even with your suggested enhancements (having enabled/disabled icons) > this patch still applies. If you manage to convince Rodney to get the > icons in gnome-icon-theme I'll send you the necessary patch. I did my own patch to handle the update-icon-cache thing properly in cases of distcheck and the maintainers. For now I also only included the 22x22 icons. Still have to re-think the file structure. Would be nice if we had some nice templates for doing this properly within one directory. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel