From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: Gnome applet failing with current BlueZ? From: Bastien Nocera To: David Sainty Cc: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: <4A6E523E.6000802@dtsp.co.nz> References: <4A6E3161.7010105@dtsp.co.nz> <1248742400.23466.11069.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A6E523E.6000802@dtsp.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:23:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1248744238.23466.11103.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 13:19 +1200, David Sainty wrote: > Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 10:59 +1200, David Sainty wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Using BlueZ 4.46 and Gnome Bluetooth 2.27.8, the applet icon fails to > >> appear. If I pull the USB adapter out and in the icon appears, but with > >> a little red cross, and it isn't very functional. > >> > > > > Is bluetoothd running? > > > > > > Yes, and otherwise functional. For example, I'm sending this reply over > a bluetooth GPRS connection, and at the same time can see the > non-functional bluetooth-applet icon with the little red/white cross. > > Running bluetoothd in debug mode didn't seem to display any useful > information relating to the applet. > Agent registration failed: Rejected send message, 2 matched rules; > type="method_call", sender=":1.12" (uid=1000 pid=1473 > comm="bluetooth-applet -d ") interface="org.bluez.Adapter" > member="RegisterAgent" error name="(unset)" requested_reply=0 > destination="org.bluez" (uid=0 pid=1100 comm="bluetoothd ")) Do you have blueman, or the applet from bluez-gnome running? Looks like D-Bus is refusing the connection, which version of bluez are you using? > >> I'm not sure when this stopped working, having got suitably confused > >> over whether to use bluez-gnome or gnome-bluetooth I've ended up using > >> neither for some time :) bluez-gnome doesn't work either though. > >> > > > > I'm not sure what confusion there should be. Use gnome-bluetooth. > > > > Well that clears that up :) But it isn't that obvious from the state of > the various web pages. Which web pages? Cheers