From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: jcaden@libresoft.es
Cc: Claudio Takahasi <claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org>,
"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SDP patch to add support for HDP
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:25:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260030350.3041.25.camel@violet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911171208.13972.jcaden@libresoft.es>
Hi Jose,
> > > This patch tries to simplify the way the SDP records for HDP are created.
> > > The created functions allow adding supported features easily to an sdp
> > > record. The are similar to sdp_set_profile_descs and
> > > sdp_get_profile_descs. I've also added some macros to define new UUID's
> > > for HDP.
> > Do you have an application or sdptool's patch to test these functions?
>
> We have an HDP/MCAP implementation that uses this functions. We are going to
> release it this week. Sancane and I are solving some problems with this code.
> We will announce here when this code is available.
>
> About the patch to sdptool: I didn't do anything but I can do it if you think
> that is a good task.
> I made some changes correcting all the problems that you suggested an other
> that I found.
> Here's the new pach:
so first of all, fix your mail client to submit this patch properly. If
it messes with it I can't apply it.
patch: **** malformed patch at line 161: SDP_ATTR_SUPPORTED_FEATURES_LIST, seqp);
>
> diff --git a/lib/sdp.c b/lib/sdp.c
> index 822ec1a..79f1261 100644
> --- a/lib/sdp.c
> +++ b/lib/sdp.c
> @@ -4621,3 +4621,87 @@ uint16_t sdp_gen_tid(sdp_session_t *session)
> {
> return session->tid++;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * Set the supported features
> + */
> +void sdp_set_supp_feat(sdp_record_t *rec, const sdp_list_t *sf)
> +{
> + const sdp_list_t *p, *r;
> + sdp_data_t *feat, *seq_feat;
> +
> + int seqlen = sdp_list_len(sf);
> + void **seqDTDs = (void **)malloc (seqlen * sizeof(void *));
> + void **seqVals = (void **)malloc (seqlen * sizeof(void *));
This is a coding style violation in so many ways. Did you place the
whitespace in a random order.
So first of all. The casting should not be needed. And if, then after
that case you do space (void **) malloc.
Then malloc is a function and it is malloc( and not malloc (.
And also it is one space after an operator. So * sizeof.
Since you are accessing the allocated memory you need to check if malloc
succeeded or not.
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + for (p = sf; p; p = p->next) {
> + int plen = sdp_list_len(p->data);
> + void **dtds = (void **)malloc (plen * sizeof(void *));
> + void **vals = (void **)malloc (plen * sizeof(void *));
Same as above.
> + int j = 0;
> + for (r = p->data; r; r = r->next) {
> + sdp_data_t *data = (sdp_data_t*)r->data;
> + dtds[j] = &data->dtd;
> + vals[j] = &data->val;
> + j++;
> + }
> + feat = sdp_seq_alloc(dtds, vals, plen);
You need to check feat if the alloc succeeded.
> + free(dtds);
> + free(vals);
> +
> + seqDTDs[i] = &feat->dtd;
> + seqVals[i] = feat;
> + i++;
> + }
> + seq_feat = sdp_seq_alloc(seqDTDs, seqVals, seqlen);
Same as above.
> +
> + sdp_attr_replace(rec, SDP_ATTR_SUPPORTED_FEATURES_LIST, seq_feat);
> +
> + free(seqDTDs);
> + free(seqVals);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Get the supported features
> + * If an error occurred -1 is returned and errno is set
> + */
> +int sdp_get_supp_feat (const sdp_record_t *rec, sdp_list_t **seqp)
> +{
> + sdp_data_t * sdpdata, *d;
> + sdp_list_t * next;
> + *seqp = NULL;
> +
> + sdpdata = sdp_data_get(rec, SDP_ATTR_SUPPORTED_FEATURES_LIST);
> +
> + if (!sdpdata || sdpdata->dtd < SDP_SEQ8 || sdpdata->dtd > SDP_SEQ32)
> + return sdp_get_uuidseq_attr(rec,
> SDP_ATTR_SUPPORTED_FEATURES_LIST, seqp);
Here is where your mailer fully screwed it up ;)
> +
> + for (d = sdpdata->val.dataseq; d; d = d->next) {
> + sdp_data_t *dd;
> + sdp_list_t *subseq;
> + subseq = NULL;
> + if ( d->dtd < SDP_SEQ8 || d->dtd > SDP_SEQ32 )
> + goto fail;
What are these extra whitespace after ( and before ) about. Remove them.
> + for (dd = d->val.dataseq; dd; dd = dd->next) {
> + sdp_data_t *data;
> + if ( dd->dtd != SDP_UINT8 && dd->dtd != SDP_UINT16 &&
> + dd->dtd != SDP_TEXT_STR8)
Smae as above.
>
> + goto fail;
> + data = sdp_data_alloc(dd->dtd, &dd->val);
We might wanna check that alloc succeeded.
>
> + subseq = sdp_list_append(subseq, data);
> + }
> + *seqp = sdp_list_append (*seqp, subseq);
Where does this whitespace come from? It is _append(.
>
> + }
> + return 0;
> +
> +fail:
> + while (*seqp) {
> + next = (*seqp)->next;
> + sdp_list_free(*seqp, free);
> + *seqp = next;
> + }
> + errno = EINVAL;
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/lib/sdp.h b/lib/sdp.h
> index 375261e..1bb351a 100644
> --- a/lib/sdp.h
> +++ b/lib/sdp.h
> @@ -244,13 +244,16 @@ extern "C" {
> #define SDP_ATTR_GROUP_ID 0x0200
> #define SDP_ATTR_IP_SUBNET 0x0200
> #define SDP_ATTR_VERSION_NUM_LIST 0x0200
> +#define SDP_ATTR_SUPPORTED_FEATURES_LIST 0x0200
> #define SDP_ATTR_SVCDB_STATE 0x0201
Why does this look to shitty now?
> #define SDP_ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION 0x0300
> #define SDP_ATTR_EXTERNAL_NETWORK 0x0301
> #define SDP_ATTR_SUPPORTED_DATA_STORES_LIST 0x0301
> +#define SDP_ATTR_DATA_EXCHANGE_SPEC 0x0301
> #define SDP_ATTR_FAX_CLASS1_SUPPORT 0x0302
> #define SDP_ATTR_REMOTE_AUDIO_VOLUME_CONTROL 0x0302
> +#define SDP_ATTR_MCAP_SUPPORTED_PROCEDURES 0x0302
> #define SDP_ATTR_FAX_CLASS20_SUPPORT 0x0303
> #define SDP_ATTR_SUPPORTED_FORMATS_LIST 0x0303
> #define SDP_ATTR_FAX_CLASS2_SUPPORT 0x0304
Same here.
> diff --git a/lib/sdp_lib.h b/lib/sdp_lib.h
> index ee39df8..41d5786 100644
> --- a/lib/sdp_lib.h
> +++ b/lib/sdp_lib.h
> @@ -585,6 +585,19 @@ static inline int sdp_get_icon_url(const sdp_record_t
> *rec, char *str, int len)
> return sdp_get_string_attr(rec, SDP_ATTR_ICON_URL, str, len);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Set the supported features
> + * sf should be a list of list with each feature data
> + */
> +void sdp_set_supp_feat(sdp_record_t *rec, const sdp_list_t *sf);
> +
> +/*
> + * Get the supported features
> + * seqp is set to a list of list with each feature data
> + * If an error occurred -1 is returned and errno is set
> + */
> +int sdp_get_supp_feat (const sdp_record_t *rec, sdp_list_t **seqp);
And what is this whitespace doing here?
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-05 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-13 12:43 [PATCH] SDP patch to add support for HDP José Antonio Santos Cadenas
2009-11-16 17:30 ` Claudio Takahasi
2009-11-16 17:52 ` Claudio Takahasi
2009-11-17 11:08 ` José Antonio Santos Cadenas
2009-12-05 16:25 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2009-12-10 10:49 ` José Antonio Santos Cadenas
2009-12-10 10:50 ` José Antonio Santos Cadenas
2009-12-10 21:59 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-11 9:21 ` José Antonio Santos Cadenas
2009-12-11 18:32 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-14 11:35 ` José Antonio Santos Cadenas
2009-12-14 20:25 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1260030350.3041.25.camel@violet \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org \
--cc=jcaden@libresoft.es \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).