From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
"Cohen, Guy" <guy.cohen@intel.com>,
"Rindjunsky, Ron" <ron.rindjunsky@intel.com>,
"Paskar, Gregory" <gregory.paskar@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [bluetooth-next V2] Bluetooth: handle device reset event
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:57:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268683031.3897.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6F5C1D715B2DA5498A628E6B9C124F04016C15DFA3@hasmsx504.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Tomas,
> > > > > A Bluetooth device experiencing hardware failure may issue
> > > > > a HARDWARE_ERROR hci event. The reaction to this event is device
> > > > > reset flow implemented in following sequence.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Notify: HCI_DEV_DOWN
> > > > > 2. Reinitialize internal structures.
> > > > > 3. Call driver flush function
> > > > > 4. Send HCI reset request to the device.
> > > > > 5. Send HCI init sequence reset to the device.
> > > > > 6. Notify HCI_DEV_UP.
> > > >
> > > > I prefer if we create a generic per controller workqueue first before
> > > > having a workqueue for every task. Something similar to what the
> > > > mac80211 layer offers right now.
> > >
> > > That would be good approach but we are using default kernel workqueue in
> > this solution so there is no workqueue for every task.
> > > I'm not sure if this effort should block this patch.
> >
> > I have an initial patch that I have to dig out. It is actually not that
> > complicated. And I would prefer to get that one first before we apply
> > this patch.
>
> Okay, I can test this particular flow with your patch if you send it to me.
I pushed the per controller workqueue patch into bluetooth-testing.git
tree. Please adapt your patch to that and test it.
> > The reason why I really wanna solve this is because of potential race
> > conditions between the workqueue and a device removal. I have a bad
> > feeling that even with the current sysfs workqueue we have a race
> > condition hiding somewhere. So if going forward we have to shift more
> > and more code into workqueues we need a single point where this can be
> > fixed.
>
> Understood.
>
> In that context I would need to do some more instrumentation to test this kind of race for this feature.
I could be very well that we are protected against such a race. However
with moving from tasklet into workqueue I am always cautious. And I
wanna make sure that we keep the complexity simple. I want one place to
fix if it breaks and not twenty.
Regards
Marcel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-15 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-22 13:05 [bluetooth-next V2] Bluetooth: handle device reset event Tomas Winkler
2010-02-22 13:05 ` [bluetooth-next] bluetooth: hci_sysfs: use strict_strtoul instead of simple_strtoul Tomas Winkler
2010-03-09 1:03 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-03-09 1:14 ` Winkler, Tomas
2010-03-09 2:16 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-03-09 1:03 ` [bluetooth-next V2] Bluetooth: handle device reset event Marcel Holtmann
2010-03-09 21:22 ` Winkler, Tomas
2010-03-10 16:49 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-03-10 19:35 ` Winkler, Tomas
2010-03-15 19:57 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268683031.3897.81.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=gregory.paskar@intel.com \
--cc=guy.cohen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ron.rindjunsky@intel.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox