From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: suraj <suraj@atheros.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com,
Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] Implements hci_reassembly to reassemble Rx packets
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:16:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278681366.10421.112.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278672569.4048.15.camel@atheros013-desktop>
Hi Suraj,
you do need to fix your email or at least add a From: line. Otherwise
when I apply the patch this gets screwed up.
> Implements feature to reassemble HCI frames received from an input stream.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Sumangala <suraj@atheros.com>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> index 5e83f8e..3eb4c1b 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> @@ -1030,6 +1030,121 @@ int hci_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(hci_recv_frame);
>
> +static int hci_reassembly(struct hci_dev *hdev, int type, void *data,
> + int count, struct sk_buff **skb_ptr, int *remain)
Why are we not not just return remain and err combined. Negative's are
errors positives are remains.
> +{
> + int len = 0;
> + int header_len = 0;
> + struct sk_buff *skb = *skb_ptr;
> + struct { struct bt_skb_cb cb_info; int expect; } *scb;
> +
> + *remain = count;
> +
> + if (type < HCI_ACLDATA_PKT || type > HCI_EVENT_PKT)
> + return -EILSEQ;
> +
> + if (!skb) {
> +
> + switch (type) {
Remove this empty line here.
> + case HCI_ACLDATA_PKT:
> + len = HCI_MAX_FRAME_SIZE;
> + header_len = HCI_ACL_HDR_SIZE;
> + break;
The break needs to be on the same line as the code.
> + case HCI_EVENT_PKT:
> + len = HCI_MAX_EVENT_SIZE;
> + header_len = HCI_EVENT_HDR_SIZE;
> + break;
> + case HCI_SCODATA_PKT:
> + len = HCI_MAX_SCO_SIZE;
> + header_len = HCI_SCO_HDR_SIZE;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + skb = bt_skb_alloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +
> + if (!skb)
Remove the empty line here.
Do we always need GFP_ATOMIC here. I would prefer that we make that an
option of the function caller.
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + scb = (void *) skb->cb;
> + scb->expect = header_len;
> + scb->cb_info.pkt_type = (__u8)type;
It is "(__u8) type" when casting.
> +
> + skb->dev = (void *) hdev;
> + *skb_ptr = skb;
> +
> + }
> +
> + while (count) {
> +
> + scb = (void *) skb->cb;
Remove empty line here.
> + len = min(scb->expect, count);
> +
> + memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), data, len);
> +
> + count -= len;
> + data += len;
> + scb->expect -= len;
> + *remain = count;
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case HCI_EVENT_PKT:
> + if (skb->len == HCI_EVENT_HDR_SIZE) {
> + struct hci_event_hdr *h = hci_event_hdr(skb);
> + scb->expect = h->plen;
> +
> + if (skb_tailroom(skb) < scb->expect) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + *skb_ptr = NULL;
> +
> + return -ENOMEM;
Remove this empty line.
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> +
> + case HCI_ACLDATA_PKT:
> + if (skb->len == HCI_ACL_HDR_SIZE) {
> + struct hci_acl_hdr *h = hci_acl_hdr(skb);
> + scb->expect = __le16_to_cpu(h->dlen);
> +
> + if (skb_tailroom(skb) < scb->expect) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + *skb_ptr = NULL;
> +
> + return -ENOMEM;
Same here.
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> +
> + case HCI_SCODATA_PKT:
> + if (skb->len == HCI_SCO_HDR_SIZE) {
> + struct hci_sco_hdr *h = hci_sco_hdr(skb);
> + scb->expect = h->dlen;
> +
> + if (skb_tailroom(skb) < scb->expect) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + *skb_ptr = NULL;
> +
> + return -ENOMEM;
And here.
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (scb->expect == 0) {
> +
> + /* Complete frame */
Remove the empty line here.
> + bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type = type;
> + hci_recv_frame(skb);
> +
> + *skb_ptr = NULL;
> +
> + return 0;
And here.
> + }
> +
> + }
What is this empty line for. Please remove.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> /* Receive packet type fragment */
And here we need an extra empty line.
> #define __reassembly(hdev, type) ((hdev)->reassembly[(type) - 2])
Regards
Marcel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-09 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-09 10:49 [PATCH v4 1/3] Implements hci_reassembly to reassemble Rx packets suraj
2010-07-09 10:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] Modified hci_recv_fragment() to use hci_reassembly suraj
2010-07-09 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] Implemented HCI frame reassembly for Rx from stream suraj
2010-07-09 12:59 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-07-09 13:16 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278681366.10421.112.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suraj@atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).