Linux bluetooth development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Emeltchenko Andrei <Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Bluetooth: new sockopt to enter active state when sending data
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:31:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281612715.12579.257.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281448112-2944-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com>

Hi Andrei,

> Patch adds new socket option to enter active state when sending
> data. Modified version of Fabien Chevalier patch (Sep/2008).
> Discussions:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/bluez-devel/msg00567.html
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg03765.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@nokia.com>
> ---
>  include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |    1 +
>  include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h    |    2 ++
>  net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c         |    7 ++++++-
>  net/bluetooth/l2cap.c            |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> index e42f6ed..477a492 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ struct hci_conn {
>  	__u8             auth_type;
>  	__u8             sec_level;
>  	__u8             power_save;
> +	__u8             force_active;
>  	__u16            disc_timeout;
>  	unsigned long	 pend;
>  
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> index 7c695bf..540cca7 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ struct l2cap_conninfo {
>  #define L2CAP_LM_RELIABLE	0x0010
>  #define L2CAP_LM_SECURE		0x0020
>  
> +#define L2CAP_FORCE_ACTIVE_MODE	0x04
> +
>  /* L2CAP command codes */
>  #define L2CAP_COMMAND_REJ	0x01
>  #define L2CAP_CONN_REQ		0x02
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> index 800b6b9..11fc44a 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ struct hci_conn *hci_conn_add(struct hci_dev *hdev, int type, bdaddr_t *dst)
>  	conn->auth_type = HCI_AT_GENERAL_BONDING;
>  
>  	conn->power_save = 1;
> +	/* Do not enter active state by default */ 
> +	conn->force_active = 0;
>  	conn->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT;
>  
>  	switch (type) {
> @@ -505,7 +507,10 @@ void hci_conn_enter_active_mode(struct hci_conn *conn)
>  	if (test_bit(HCI_RAW, &hdev->flags))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (conn->mode != HCI_CM_SNIFF || !conn->power_save)
> +	if (conn->mode != HCI_CM_SNIFF)
> +		goto timer;
> +
> +	if (!conn->power_save && !conn->force_active)
>  		goto timer;
>  
>  	if (!test_and_set_bit(HCI_CONN_MODE_CHANGE_PEND, &conn->pend)) {
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> index cf3c407..5328e82 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> @@ -1909,6 +1909,15 @@ static int l2cap_sock_setsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname, char __us
>  		l2cap_pi(sk)->force_reliable = (opt & L2CAP_LM_RELIABLE);
>  		break;
>  
> +	case L2CAP_FORCE_ACTIVE_MODE:
> +		if (get_user(opt, (u32 __user *) optval)) {
> +			err = -EFAULT;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		
> +		l2cap_pi(sk)->conn->hcon->force_active = opt;
> +		break;
> +
>  	default:
>  		err = -ENOPROTOOPT;
>  		break;
> @@ -2058,6 +2067,12 @@ static int l2cap_sock_getsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname, char __us
>  
>  		break;
>  
> +	case L2CAP_FORCE_ACTIVE_MODE:
> +		if (put_user(l2cap_pi(sk)->conn->hcon->force_active,
> +					(u32 __user *) optval))
> +			err = -EFAULT;
> +		break;
> +
>  	default:
>  		err = -ENOPROTOOPT;
>  		break;

I think that I said this before. Why do you think that adding a new
socket option to something called _old is a good idea? I made it pretty
clear in the code that it is an OLD interface.

I want this on the SOL_BLUETOOTH level with a proper new socket option.
And we might even consider doing it like BT_SECURITY where create the
struct to potentially add other flags later.

So why not doing BT_POWER or something like that.

And in addition you need to store these values on a per L2CAP or RFCOMM
socket. You can not just go ahead and mess inside hci_conn via an L2CAP
socket option.

Regards

Marcel




  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-12 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-10 13:48 [PATCHv2] Bluetooth: new sockopt to enter active state when sending data Emeltchenko Andrei
2010-08-12 11:31 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2010-08-12 12:25   ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2010-08-12 13:07     ` Marcel Holtmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1281612715.12579.257.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox