From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Emeltchenko Andrei <Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/2] Fix kernel crash in rfcomm/l2cap
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:36:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289367396.9615.238.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288780365-32099-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com>
Hi Andrei,
> Yet another version of patches fixing kernel crash in RFCOMM / L2CAP.
> *v4: taken Gustavo comments about timer HZ -> HZ/5
>
> Do not delete l2cap channel and socket sk when sk is owned by user.
> To delete l2cap channel standard timer is used.
>
> lock_sock and release_sock do not hold a normal spinlock directly but
> instead hold the owner field. This means bh_lock_sock can still execute
> even if the socket is "locked". More info can be found here:
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/socketlocks
>
> When sending following sequence:
> ...
> No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info
> 89 1.951202 RFCOMM Rcvd DISC DLCI=20
> 90 1.951324 RFCOMM Sent UA DLCI=20
> 91 1.959381 HCI_EVT Number of Completed Packets
> 92 1.966461 RFCOMM Rcvd DISC DLCI=0
> 93 1.966492 L2CAP Rcvd Disconnect Request
> 94 1.972595 L2CAP Sent Disconnect Response
>
> ...
>
> krfcommd kernel thread is preempted with l2cap tasklet which remove l2cap_conn
> (L2CAP connection handler structure). Then rfcomm thread tries to send RFCOMM
> UA which is reply to RFCOMM DISC and when de-referencing l2cap_conn crash
> happens.
so I assume you have tested this extensively with various RFCOMM corner
cases like incoming RFCOMM. Since a lot of profiles require proper
disconnects and we have to ensure that our reference counting is
correct.
Other then that it seems fine to me.
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-03 10:32 [PATCHv4 0/2] Fix kernel crash in rfcomm/l2cap Emeltchenko Andrei
2010-11-03 10:32 ` [PATCHv4 1/2] Bluetooth: Check sk is not owned before freeing l2cap_conn Emeltchenko Andrei
2010-11-03 10:32 ` [PATCHv4 2/2] Bluetooth: timer check sk is not owned before freeing Emeltchenko Andrei
2010-11-10 5:36 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2010-11-10 15:24 ` [PATCHv4 0/2] Fix kernel crash in rfcomm/l2cap Andrei Emeltchenko
2010-11-10 16:32 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289367396.9615.238.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox