From: johan.hedberg@gmail.com
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: Simplify remote features callback function logic
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:11:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289401913-22982-1-git-send-email-johan.hedberg@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com>
The current remote and remote extended features event callbacks logic
can be made simpler by using a label and goto statements instead of the
current multiple levels of nested if statements.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com>
---
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index 84093b0..8430276 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -1162,33 +1162,33 @@ static inline void hci_remote_features_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, __le16_to_cpu(ev->handle));
- if (conn) {
- if (!ev->status)
- memcpy(conn->features, ev->features, 8);
+ if (!conn)
+ goto unlock;
- if (conn->state == BT_CONFIG) {
- if (!ev->status && lmp_ssp_capable(hdev) &&
- lmp_ssp_capable(conn)) {
- struct hci_cp_read_remote_ext_features cp;
- cp.handle = ev->handle;
- cp.page = 0x01;
- hci_send_cmd(hdev,
- HCI_OP_READ_REMOTE_EXT_FEATURES,
- sizeof(cp), &cp);
- } else if (!ev->status && conn->out &&
- conn->sec_level == BT_SECURITY_HIGH) {
- struct hci_cp_auth_requested cp;
- cp.handle = ev->handle;
- hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_AUTH_REQUESTED,
+ if (!ev->status)
+ memcpy(conn->features, ev->features, 8);
+
+ if (conn->state != BT_CONFIG)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ if (!ev->status && lmp_ssp_capable(hdev) && lmp_ssp_capable(conn)) {
+ struct hci_cp_read_remote_ext_features cp;
+ cp.handle = ev->handle;
+ cp.page = 0x01;
+ hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_READ_REMOTE_EXT_FEATURES,
sizeof(cp), &cp);
- } else {
- conn->state = BT_CONNECTED;
- hci_proto_connect_cfm(conn, ev->status);
- hci_conn_put(conn);
- }
- }
+ } else if (!ev->status && conn->out &&
+ conn->sec_level == BT_SECURITY_HIGH) {
+ struct hci_cp_auth_requested cp;
+ cp.handle = ev->handle;
+ hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_AUTH_REQUESTED, sizeof(cp), &cp);
+ } else {
+ conn->state = BT_CONNECTED;
+ hci_proto_connect_cfm(conn, ev->status);
+ hci_conn_put(conn);
}
+unlock:
hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
}
@@ -1646,32 +1646,35 @@ static inline void hci_remote_ext_features_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_b
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, __le16_to_cpu(ev->handle));
- if (conn) {
- if (!ev->status && ev->page == 0x01) {
- struct inquiry_entry *ie;
+ if (!conn)
+ goto unlock;
- if ((ie = hci_inquiry_cache_lookup(hdev, &conn->dst)))
- ie->data.ssp_mode = (ev->features[0] & 0x01);
+ if (!ev->status && ev->page == 0x01) {
+ struct inquiry_entry *ie;
- conn->ssp_mode = (ev->features[0] & 0x01);
- }
+ if ((ie = hci_inquiry_cache_lookup(hdev, &conn->dst)))
+ ie->data.ssp_mode = (ev->features[0] & 0x01);
- if (conn->state == BT_CONFIG) {
- if (!ev->status && hdev->ssp_mode > 0 &&
- conn->ssp_mode > 0 && conn->out &&
- conn->sec_level != BT_SECURITY_SDP) {
- struct hci_cp_auth_requested cp;
- cp.handle = ev->handle;
- hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_AUTH_REQUESTED,
- sizeof(cp), &cp);
- } else {
- conn->state = BT_CONNECTED;
- hci_proto_connect_cfm(conn, ev->status);
- hci_conn_put(conn);
- }
- }
+ conn->ssp_mode = (ev->features[0] & 0x01);
+ }
+
+ if (conn->state != BT_CONFIG)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ if (!ev->status && hdev->ssp_mode > 0 &&
+ conn->ssp_mode > 0 && conn->out &&
+ conn->sec_level != BT_SECURITY_SDP) {
+ struct hci_cp_auth_requested cp;
+ cp.handle = ev->handle;
+ hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_AUTH_REQUESTED,
+ sizeof(cp), &cp);
+ } else {
+ conn->state = BT_CONNECTED;
+ hci_proto_connect_cfm(conn, ev->status);
+ hci_conn_put(conn);
}
+unlock:
hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
}
--
1.7.2.3
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 15:11 johan.hedberg [this message]
2010-11-10 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: Create a unified authentication request function johan.hedberg
2010-11-10 15:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: Automate remote name requests johan.hedberg
2010-11-10 21:11 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2010-11-16 22:09 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-11-17 22:30 ` Johan Hedberg
2010-11-17 23:01 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-11-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: Simplify remote features callback function logic Gustavo F. Padovan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289401913-22982-1-git-send-email-johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--to=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=johan.hedberg@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).