From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Claudio Takahasi <claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org>
Cc: BlueZ development <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@profusion.mobi>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: Read RSSI through Management Interface?
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:18:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303784308.15916.36.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikWMu3nNP0nUN3xVr2jzJmLhrx09Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Claudio,
> >> we need to read the RSSI of LE and basic rate connections to implement
> >> the Proximity profile. RSSI included in the advertising packets can't
> >> be used for Proximity, it requires an "active" connection.
> >>
> >> Here are some suggestions:
> >>
> >> 1. Add a new command to mgmt interface to add a given address into a
> >> RSSI "monitoring list".
> >> When the connection is established the kernel will automatically
> >> track the RSSI of the connection on regular intervals sending
> >> HCI_Read_RSSI. Read RSSI value can be reported through a new event in
> >> the management interface
> >
> > the HCI_Read_RSSI on basic rate is a useless command since it depends
> > highly on the power control. Especially since all Bluetooth chips try to
> > keep this one optimized.
> >
> > The RSSI from an active connection does not really give us much. And in
> > addition we have a lot of legacy BR chips just plain failing this
> > command and returning static data. How do you plan to address this?
>
> I don't expect to have an accurate measurement of the RSSI for basic
> rate, we are only trying to have the profile operational on both
> transports. If it is not feasible enable it for basic rate we can keep
> only Link Loss service running.
>
> For LE, I hope we get better results. The fact is: we need a way to
> get the RSSI value of an active connection on regular intervals.
> Any other suggestion to implement this service keeping transport abstraction?
the problem with RSSI is really that for basic rate, it is different
from the HCI_Read_RSSI command and Inquiry_Result_with_RSSI event. The
value from inquiry is most likely useful while the connected value is
rather pointless.
The HCI_Read_Link_Quality is way better, but the problem is that its
implementation is vendor specific :(
Regards
Marcel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 22:20 Read RSSI through Management Interface? Claudio Takahasi
2011-04-21 1:18 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-04-22 2:45 ` Claudio Takahasi
2011-05-11 11:22 ` Arun Kumar SINGH
2011-04-21 3:36 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-04-22 2:58 ` Claudio Takahasi
2011-04-26 2:18 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303784308.15916.36.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=padovan@profusion.mobi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox