From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/15] Bluetooth: Check pending command in start_discovery()
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:30:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318703467.15441.66.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317856847-28167-4-git-send-email-andre.guedes@openbossa.org>
Hi Andre,
> If discovery procedure is already running then EINPROGRESS command
> status should be returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/mgmt.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> index cc0c204..d8333e0 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> @@ -1622,6 +1622,12 @@ static int start_discovery(struct sock *sk, u16 index)
>
> hci_dev_lock_bh(hdev);
>
> + if (mgmt_pending_find(MGMT_OP_START_DISCOVERY, index)) {
> + err = cmd_status(sk, index, MGMT_OP_START_DISCOVERY,
> + EINPROGRESS);
> + goto failed;
> + }
> +
I still do not like this at all. There should be a flag that clearly
identifies if we are doing a discovery right now or not.
We need a flag on per controller to know if currently a discovery is
going on. And going through all controllers and all pending commands to
figure this out seems not a good idea. Even with a low amount of pending
commands, then mgmt_pending_find is an expensive operation.
> cmd = mgmt_pending_add(sk, MGMT_OP_START_DISCOVERY, index, NULL, 0);
> if (!cmd) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
The other question I have is why we have to duplicate the parameters
when adding a command to the list. Why not keep a reference of the SKB?
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-15 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-05 23:20 [PATCH v5 00/15] Discovery procedure support Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] Bluetooth: Periodic Inquiry and mgmt discovering event Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] Bluetooth: Add mgmt_discovery_complete() Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] Bluetooth: Check pending command in start_discovery() Andre Guedes
2011-10-15 18:30 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2011-10-17 12:59 ` Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] Bluetooth: Check pending commands in stop_discovery() Andre Guedes
2011-10-15 18:33 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] Bluetooth: Create hci_do_inquiry() Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] Bluetooth: Create hci_cancel_inquiry() Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] Bluetooth: Handle race condition in Discovery Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] Bluetooth: Prepare for full support discovery procedures Andre Guedes
2011-10-06 18:50 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-06 20:30 ` Andre Guedes
2011-10-07 19:51 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-10 16:47 ` Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] Bluetooth: Send mgmt_discovering events Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] Bluetooth: Add 'eir_len' param to mgmt_device_found() Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] Bluetooth: Report LE devices Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] Bluetooth: Add LE Set Scan Parameter Command Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] Bluetooth: LE scan infra-structure Andre Guedes
2011-10-06 19:06 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-06 20:31 ` Andre Guedes
2011-10-07 20:12 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-07 20:31 ` Johan Hedberg
2011-10-10 16:48 ` Andre Guedes
2011-10-15 18:18 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-10-17 12:50 ` Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] Bluetooth: Support LE-Only discovery procedure Andre Guedes
2011-10-05 23:20 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] Bluetooth: Support BR/EDR/LE " Andre Guedes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318703467.15441.66.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=andre.guedes@openbossa.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).