From: Brian Gix <bgix@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Brian Gix <bgix@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] Bluetooth: Add MITM mechanism to LE-SMP
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:01:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1321164079-2216-9-git-send-email-bgix@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321164079-2216-1-git-send-email-bgix@codeaurora.org>
To achive Man-In-The-Middle (MITM) level security with Low Energy,
we have to enable User Passkey Comparison. This commit modifies the
hard-coded JUST-WORKS pairing mechanism to support query via the MGMT
interface of Passkey comparison and User Confirmation.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gix <bgix@codeaurora.org>
---
include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 1 +
include/net/bluetooth/smp.h | 3 +
net/bluetooth/smp.c | 231 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
index 0b692ea..be052d6 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
@@ -312,6 +312,7 @@ struct hci_conn {
struct hci_dev *hdev;
void *l2cap_data;
void *sco_data;
+ void *smp_conn;
struct hci_conn *link;
diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/smp.h b/include/net/bluetooth/smp.h
index 15b97d5..43b6c49 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/smp.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/smp.h
@@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ struct smp_chan {
u8 pcnf[16]; /* SMP Pairing Confirm */
u8 tk[16]; /* SMP Temporary Key */
u8 smp_key_size;
+ u8 smp_tk_valid;
+ u8 smp_cfm_pending;
struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm;
struct work_struct confirm;
struct work_struct random;
@@ -134,6 +136,7 @@ struct smp_chan {
int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level);
int smp_sig_channel(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb);
int smp_distribute_keys(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 force);
+int smp_user_confirm_reply(struct hci_conn *conn, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey);
void smp_chan_destroy(struct l2cap_conn *conn);
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
index af8dde4..6356fba 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
#include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
#include <net/bluetooth/l2cap.h>
+#include <net/bluetooth/mgmt.h>
#include <net/bluetooth/smp.h>
#include <linux/crypto.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
@@ -188,24 +189,46 @@ static void smp_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code, u16 len, void *data)
msecs_to_jiffies(SMP_TIMEOUT));
}
+static __u8 authreq_to_seclevel(__u8 authreq)
+{
+ if (authreq & SMP_AUTH_MITM)
+ return BT_SECURITY_HIGH;
+ else
+ return BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM;
+}
+
+static __u8 seclevel_to_authreq(__u8 sec_level)
+{
+ switch (sec_level) {
+ case BT_SECURITY_HIGH:
+ return SMP_AUTH_MITM | SMP_AUTH_BONDING;
+ case BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM:
+ return SMP_AUTH_BONDING;
+ default:
+ return SMP_AUTH_NONE;
+ }
+}
+
static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
struct smp_cmd_pairing *req,
struct smp_cmd_pairing *rsp,
__u8 authreq)
{
- u8 dist_keys;
+ u8 all_keys = 0;
+ u8 dist_keys = 0;
- dist_keys = 0;
if (test_bit(HCI_PAIRABLE, &conn->hcon->hdev->flags)) {
dist_keys = SMP_DIST_ENC_KEY;
authreq |= SMP_AUTH_BONDING;
+ } else {
+ authreq &= ~SMP_AUTH_BONDING;
}
if (rsp == NULL) {
req->io_capability = conn->hcon->io_capability;
req->oob_flag = SMP_OOB_NOT_PRESENT;
req->max_key_size = SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
- req->init_key_dist = dist_keys;
+ req->init_key_dist = all_keys;
req->resp_key_dist = dist_keys;
req->auth_req = authreq;
return;
@@ -214,7 +237,7 @@ static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
rsp->io_capability = conn->hcon->io_capability;
rsp->oob_flag = SMP_OOB_NOT_PRESENT;
rsp->max_key_size = SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
- rsp->init_key_dist = req->init_key_dist & dist_keys;
+ rsp->init_key_dist = req->init_key_dist & all_keys;
rsp->resp_key_dist = req->resp_key_dist & dist_keys;
rsp->auth_req = authreq;
}
@@ -244,6 +267,93 @@ static void smp_failure(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 reason, u8 send)
smp_chan_destroy(conn);
}
+#define JUST_WORKS 0x00
+#define JUST_CFM 0x01
+#define REQ_PASSKEY 0x02
+#define CFM_PASSKEY 0x03
+#define REQ_OOB 0x04
+#define OVERLAP 0xFF
+
+static const u8 gen_method[5][5] = {
+ {JUST_WORKS, JUST_CFM, REQ_PASSKEY, JUST_WORKS, REQ_PASSKEY},
+ {JUST_WORKS, JUST_CFM, REQ_PASSKEY, JUST_WORKS, REQ_PASSKEY},
+ {CFM_PASSKEY, CFM_PASSKEY, REQ_PASSKEY, JUST_WORKS, CFM_PASSKEY},
+ {JUST_WORKS, JUST_CFM, JUST_WORKS, JUST_WORKS, JUST_CFM},
+ {CFM_PASSKEY, CFM_PASSKEY, REQ_PASSKEY, JUST_WORKS, OVERLAP}
+};
+
+static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
+ u8 local_io, u8 remote_io)
+{
+ struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
+ struct smp_chan *smp = conn->smp_chan;
+ u8 method;
+ u32 passkey = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /* Initialize key to JUST WORKS */
+ memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk));
+ smp->smp_tk_valid = 0;
+
+ BT_DBG("tk_request: auth:%d lcl:%d rem:%d", auth, local_io, remote_io);
+
+ /* If neither side wants MITM, use JUST WORKS */
+ /* If either side has unknown io_caps, use JUST_WORKS */
+ if (!(auth & SMP_AUTH_MITM) ||
+ local_io > SMP_IO_KEYBOARD_DISPLAY ||
+ remote_io > SMP_IO_KEYBOARD_DISPLAY) {
+ auth &= ~SMP_AUTH_MITM;
+ smp->smp_tk_valid = 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* MITM is now officially requested, but not required */
+ /* Determine what we need (if anything) from the agent */
+ method = gen_method[local_io][remote_io];
+
+ if (method == JUST_WORKS || method == JUST_CFM)
+ auth &= ~SMP_AUTH_MITM;
+
+ /* Don't bother confirming unbonded JUST_WORKS */
+ if (!(auth & SMP_AUTH_BONDING) && method == JUST_CFM) {
+ smp->smp_tk_valid = 1;
+ return 0;
+ } else if (method == JUST_WORKS) {
+ smp->smp_tk_valid = 1;
+ return 0;
+ } else if (method == OVERLAP) {
+ if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER)
+ method = CFM_PASSKEY;
+ else
+ method = REQ_PASSKEY;
+ }
+
+ if (method == CFM_PASSKEY) {
+ u8 key[16];
+ /* Generate a passkey for display. It is not valid until
+ * confirmed.
+ */
+ memset(key, 0, sizeof(key));
+ get_random_bytes(&passkey, sizeof(passkey));
+ passkey %= 1000000;
+ put_unaligned_le32(passkey, key);
+ swap128(key, smp->tk);
+ BT_DBG("PassKey: %d", passkey);
+ }
+
+ hci_dev_lock(hcon->hdev);
+
+ if (method == REQ_PASSKEY)
+ ret = mgmt_user_confirm_request(hcon->hdev, conn->dst, 0, 0);
+ else
+ ret = mgmt_user_confirm_request(hcon->hdev, conn->dst,
+ cpu_to_le32(passkey), 0);
+
+ hci_dev_unlock(hcon->hdev);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void confirm_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct smp_chan *smp = container_of(work, struct smp_chan, confirm);
@@ -276,6 +386,8 @@ static void confirm_work(struct work_struct *work)
goto error;
}
+ smp->smp_cfm_pending = 0;
+
swap128(res, cp.confirm_val);
smp_send_cmd(smp->conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM, sizeof(cp), &cp);
@@ -381,6 +493,7 @@ static struct smp_chan *smp_chan_create(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
smp->conn = conn;
conn->smp_chan = smp;
+ conn->hcon->smp_conn = conn;
hci_conn_hold(conn->hcon);
@@ -396,18 +509,70 @@ void smp_chan_destroy(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
kfree(smp);
conn->smp_chan = NULL;
+ conn->hcon->smp_conn = NULL;
hci_conn_put(conn->hcon);
}
+int smp_user_confirm_reply(struct hci_conn *hcon, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey)
+{
+ struct l2cap_conn *conn = hcon->smp_conn;
+ struct smp_chan *smp = conn->smp_chan;
+ u32 value;
+ u8 key[16];
+ u8 reason = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ BT_DBG("");
+
+ switch (mgmt_op) {
+ case MGMT_OP_USER_PASSKEY_REPLY:
+ value = le32_to_cpu(passkey);
+ memset(key, 0, sizeof(key));
+ BT_DBG("PassKey: %d", value);
+ put_unaligned_le32(value, key);
+ swap128(key, smp->tk);
+ /* Fall Through */
+ case MGMT_OP_USER_CONFIRM_REPLY:
+ smp->smp_tk_valid = 1;
+ break;
+ default:
+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ /* Fall Through */
+ case MGMT_OP_USER_PASSKEY_NEG_REPLY:
+ case MGMT_OP_USER_CONFIRM_NEG_REPLY:
+ reason = SMP_PASSKEY_ENTRY_FAILED;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (reason) {
+ BT_DBG("smp_send_cmd: SMP_CMD_PAIRING_FAIL");
+ smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_FAIL, sizeof(reason),
+ &reason);
+ clear_bit(HCI_CONN_ENCRYPT_PEND, &hcon->pend);
+ mgmt_auth_failed(hcon->hdev, conn->dst, reason);
+ del_timer(&conn->security_timer);
+ smp_chan_destroy(conn);
+ } else if (smp->smp_cfm_pending) {
+ BT_DBG("send_pairing_confirm");
+ queue_work(hcon->hdev->workqueue, &smp->confirm);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct smp_cmd_pairing rsp, *req = (void *) skb->data;
struct smp_chan *smp;
u8 key_size;
+ u8 auth = SMP_AUTH_NONE;
int ret;
BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
+ if (conn->hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER)
+ return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
+
if (!test_and_set_bit(HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND, &conn->hcon->pend))
smp = smp_chan_create(conn);
@@ -417,19 +582,16 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
memcpy(&smp->preq[1], req, sizeof(*req));
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*req));
- if (req->oob_flag)
- return SMP_OOB_NOT_AVAIL;
+ /* We didn't start the pairing, so match remote */
+ if (req->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING)
+ auth = req->auth_req;
- /* We didn't start the pairing, so no requirements */
- build_pairing_cmd(conn, req, &rsp, SMP_AUTH_NONE);
+ build_pairing_cmd(conn, req, &rsp, auth);
key_size = min(req->max_key_size, rsp.max_key_size);
if (check_enc_key_size(conn, key_size))
return SMP_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
- /* Just works */
- memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk));
-
ret = smp_rand(smp->prnd);
if (ret)
return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
@@ -439,6 +601,11 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP, sizeof(rsp), &rsp);
+ /* Request setup of TK */
+ ret = tk_request(conn, 0, auth, rsp.io_capability, req->io_capability);
+ if (ret)
+ return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -447,11 +614,14 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct smp_cmd_pairing *req, *rsp = (void *) skb->data;
struct smp_chan *smp = conn->smp_chan;
struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hcon->hdev;
- u8 key_size;
+ u8 key_size, auth = SMP_AUTH_NONE;
int ret;
BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
+ if (!(conn->hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER))
+ return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
+
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rsp));
req = (void *) &smp->preq[1];
@@ -460,12 +630,6 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (check_enc_key_size(conn, key_size))
return SMP_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
- if (rsp->oob_flag)
- return SMP_OOB_NOT_AVAIL;
-
- /* Just works */
- memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk));
-
ret = smp_rand(smp->prnd);
if (ret)
return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
@@ -473,6 +637,22 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
smp->prsp[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP;
memcpy(&smp->prsp[1], rsp, sizeof(*rsp));
+ if ((req->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING) &&
+ (rsp->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING))
+ auth = SMP_AUTH_BONDING;
+
+ auth |= (req->auth_req | rsp->auth_req) & SMP_AUTH_MITM;
+
+ ret = tk_request(conn, 0, auth, rsp->io_capability, req->io_capability);
+ if (ret)
+ return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
+
+ smp->smp_cfm_pending = 1;
+
+ /* Can't compose response until we have been confirmed */
+ if (!smp->smp_tk_valid)
+ return 0;
+
queue_work(hdev->workqueue, &smp->confirm);
return 0;
@@ -494,8 +674,10 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
swap128(smp->prnd, random);
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM, sizeof(random),
random);
- } else {
+ } else if (smp->smp_tk_valid) {
queue_work(hdev->workqueue, &smp->confirm);
+ } else {
+ smp->smp_cfm_pending = 1;
}
return 0;
@@ -548,7 +730,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
- hcon->pending_sec_level = BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM;
+ hcon->pending_sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(rp->auth_req);
if (smp_ltk_encrypt(conn))
return 0;
@@ -575,6 +757,7 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level)
{
struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
struct smp_chan *smp = conn->smp_chan;
+ __u8 authreq;
BT_DBG("conn %p hcon %p level 0x%2.2x", conn, hcon, sec_level);
@@ -595,18 +778,22 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level)
return 0;
smp = smp_chan_create(conn);
+ if (!smp)
+ return 1;
+
+ authreq = seclevel_to_authreq(sec_level);
if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) {
struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
- build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, SMP_AUTH_NONE);
+ build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, authreq);
smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
memcpy(&smp->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp));
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
} else {
struct smp_cmd_security_req cp;
- cp.auth_req = SMP_AUTH_NONE;
+ cp.auth_req = authreq;
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
}
--
1.7.7.2
--
Brian Gix
bgix@codeaurora.org
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-13 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-13 6:01 [PATCH 0/9] Bluetooth: Add MITM protection to LE-SMP Brian Gix
2011-11-13 6:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] Bluetooth: Add HCI defines for User Passkey entry Brian Gix
2011-11-13 6:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] Bluetooth: Add MGMT opcodes for Passkey Entry Brian Gix
2011-11-13 6:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] Bluetooth: User Pairing Response restructuring Brian Gix
2011-11-16 18:49 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-11-13 6:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] Bluetooth: Add User Passkey Response handling Brian Gix
2011-11-13 6:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] Bluetooth: Add HCI User Passkey Req Evt handling Brian Gix
2011-11-13 6:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] Bluetooth: Cleanup blkcipher on SMP termination Brian Gix
2011-11-13 6:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] Bluetooth: Centralize SMP pairing failure handling Brian Gix
2011-11-13 6:01 ` Brian Gix [this message]
2011-11-13 6:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] Bluetooth: Add SMP to User Passkey and Confirm Brian Gix
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-16 0:32 [PATCH 0/9] Bluetooth: Add MITM protection to LE-SMP Brian Gix
2011-11-16 0:32 ` [PATCH 8/9] Bluetooth: Add MITM mechanism " Brian Gix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1321164079-2216-9-git-send-email-bgix@codeaurora.org \
--to=bgix@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).