From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: johan.hedberg@gmail.com
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Bluetooth: Add timer for automatically disabling the service cache
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:16:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323900964.1965.66.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323899524-13653-6-git-send-email-johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
Hi Johan,
> We do not want the service cache to be enabled indefinitely after
> mgmt_read_info is called. The solve this a timer is added which will
> automaticall disable the cache if mgmt_set_dev_class isn't called within
it is "automatically".
> 5 seconds of calling mgmt_read_info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 2 +
> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 3 ++
> net/bluetooth/mgmt.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> index 4e67bb8..a5d7e42 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> @@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ struct hci_dev {
> __u16 discov_timeout;
> struct delayed_work discov_off;
>
> + struct delayed_work service_cache;
> +
> struct timer_list cmd_timer;
> struct tasklet_struct cmd_task;
> struct tasklet_struct rx_task;
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> index ce3727e..323be52 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> @@ -597,6 +597,9 @@ static int hci_dev_do_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_AUTO_OFF, &hdev->flags))
> cancel_delayed_work(&hdev->power_off);
>
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_SERVICE_CACHE, &hdev->flags))
> + cancel_delayed_work(&hdev->service_cache);
> +
> hci_dev_lock_bh(hdev);
> inquiry_cache_flush(hdev);
> hci_conn_hash_flush(hdev);
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> index 696e585..4d531b9 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
>
> #define INQUIRY_LEN_BREDR 0x08 /* TGAP(100) */
>
> +#define SERVICE_CACHE_TIMEOUT (5 * 1000)
> +
> struct pending_cmd {
> struct list_head list;
> u16 opcode;
> @@ -472,6 +474,32 @@ static int update_class(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> return hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_WRITE_CLASS_OF_DEV, sizeof(cod), cod);
> }
>
> +static void service_cache_off(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct hci_dev *hdev = container_of(work, struct hci_dev,
> + service_cache.work);
> +
> + if (!test_and_clear_bit(HCI_SERVICE_CACHE, &hdev->flags))
> + return;
> +
> + hci_dev_lock_bh(hdev);
> +
> + update_eir(hdev);
> + update_class(hdev);
> +
> + hci_dev_unlock_bh(hdev);
> +}
> +
> +static void mgmt_init_hdev(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> + if (!test_and_set_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags))
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hdev->service_cache, service_cache_off);
Why does this depend on MGMT being enabled? Why do we bother here? Why
not just always initialize it when registering the controller.
> + if (!test_and_set_bit(HCI_SERVICE_CACHE, &hdev->flags))
> + queue_delayed_work(hdev->workqueue, &hdev->service_cache,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(SERVICE_CACHE_TIMEOUT));
> +}
> +
> static int read_controller_info(struct sock *sk, u16 index)
> {
> struct mgmt_rp_read_info rp;
> @@ -489,10 +517,8 @@ static int read_controller_info(struct sock *sk, u16 index)
>
> hci_dev_lock_bh(hdev);
>
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_PI_MGMT_INIT, &hci_pi(sk)->flags)) {
> - set_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags);
> - set_bit(HCI_SERVICE_CACHE, &hdev->flags);
> - }
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_PI_MGMT_INIT, &hci_pi(sk)->flags))
> + mgmt_init_hdev(hdev);
>
> memset(&rp, 0, sizeof(rp));
>
> @@ -992,8 +1018,12 @@ static int set_dev_class(struct sock *sk, u16 index, unsigned char *data,
> hdev->major_class = cp->major;
> hdev->minor_class = cp->minor;
>
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_SERVICE_CACHE, &hdev->flags))
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_SERVICE_CACHE, &hdev->flags)) {
> + hci_dev_unlock_bh(hdev);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hdev->service_cache);
> + hci_dev_lock_bh(hdev);
> update_eir(hdev);
> + }
We have to be a bit careful here since essentially the service cache
(actually UUID cache to be precise) is a per mgmt socket feature and not
a per hdev feature.
I have nothing against merging this first, but keep in mind that this
needs to be updated since we can have two concurrent applications
opening a mgmt socket.
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-14 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-14 21:51 [PATCH 0/7] Update mgmt interface to latest specification johan.hedberg
2011-12-14 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] Bluetooth: Update mgmt_read_info and related mgmt messages johan.hedberg
2011-12-14 22:04 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-12-15 9:02 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2011-12-15 9:31 ` Johan Hedberg
2011-12-14 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] Bluetooth: Move mgmt_set_fast_connectable to the right location johan.hedberg
2011-12-14 22:06 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-12-16 6:26 ` Hemant Gupta
2011-12-14 21:52 ` [PATCH 3/7] Bluetooth: Remove mgmt_set_service_cache johan.hedberg
2011-12-14 22:08 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-12-14 21:52 ` [PATCH 4/7] Bluetooth: Move EIR and CoD update functions to a better position johan.hedberg
2011-12-14 22:09 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-12-14 21:52 ` [PATCH 5/7] Bluetooth: Add timer for automatically disabling the service cache johan.hedberg
2011-12-14 22:16 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2011-12-14 22:25 ` Johan Hedberg
2011-12-14 23:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-12-14 21:52 ` [PATCH 6/7] Bluetooth: Update ordering and opcodes of mgmt messages johan.hedberg
2011-12-14 22:16 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-12-14 21:52 ` [PATCH 7/7] Bluetooth: Use correct struct for user_confirm_neg_reply johan.hedberg
2011-12-14 22:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1323900964.1965.66.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).