From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Ulisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, padovan@profusion.mobi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix deadlocks with sock lock and L2CAP timers locks
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:56:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1324511784.1965.189.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324504956-16840-1-git-send-email-ulisses@profusion.mobi>
Hi Ulisses,
> When cancelling a delayed work (timer) in L2CAP we can not sleep holding
> the sock mutex otherwise we might deadlock with an L2CAP timer handler.
> This is possible because RX/TX and L2CAP timers run in different workqueues.
> The scenario below illustrates the problem. Thus we are now avoiding to
> sleep on the timers locks.
>
> ======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 3.1.0-05270-ga978dc7-dirty #239
> -------------------------------------------------------
> kworker/1:1/873 is trying to acquire lock:
> (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth]
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}:
> [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170
> [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790
> [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0
> [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0
> [<ffffffff81052a6f>] wait_on_work+0x4f/0x160
> [<ffffffff81052ca3>] __cancel_work_timer+0x73/0x80
> [<ffffffff81052cbd>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0x10
> [<ffffffffa002f2ed>] l2cap_chan_connect+0x22d/0x470 [bluetooth]
> [<ffffffffa002fb51>] l2cap_sock_connect+0xb1/0x140 [bluetooth]
> [<ffffffff8130811b>] kernel_connect+0xb/0x10
> [<ffffffffa00cf98a>] rfcomm_session_create+0x12a/0x1c0 [rfcomm]
> [<ffffffffa00cfbe7>] __rfcomm_dlc_open+0x1c7/0x240 [rfcomm]
> [<ffffffffa00d07c2>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0x42/0x70 [rfcomm]
> [<ffffffffa00d3b03>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x103/0x150 [rfcomm]
> [<ffffffff8130bd7e>] sys_connect+0xae/0xc0
> [<ffffffff813368d2>] compat_sys_socketcall+0xb2/0x220
> [<ffffffff813b2089>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x30
>
> -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}:
> [<ffffffff8106b16d>] check_prev_add+0x6cd/0x6e0
> [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170
> [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790
> [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0
> [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0
> [<ffffffff8130d91a>] lock_sock_nested+0x8a/0xa0
> [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth]
> [<ffffffff81051ae4>] process_one_work+0x184/0x450
> [<ffffffff8105276e>] worker_thread+0x15e/0x340
> [<ffffffff81057bb6>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
> [<ffffffff813b1ef4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work));
> lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP);
> lock((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work));
> lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/873:
> #0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450
> #1: ((&(&chan->chan_timer)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81051a86>] process_one_work+0x126/0x450
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 873, comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 3.1.0-05270-ga978dc7-dirty #239
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff813a0f6e>] print_circular_bug+0xd2/0xe3
> [<ffffffff8106b16d>] check_prev_add+0x6cd/0x6e0
> [<ffffffff8106b276>] check_prevs_add+0xf6/0x170
> [<ffffffff8106b903>] validate_chain+0x613/0x790
> [<ffffffff8106dfee>] __lock_acquire+0x4be/0xac0
> [<ffffffff8130d8f6>] ? lock_sock_nested+0x66/0xa0
> [<ffffffff8106ea30>] ? lock_release_nested+0x100/0x110
> [<ffffffff8130d8f6>] ? lock_sock_nested+0x66/0xa0
> [<ffffffff8106ec2d>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xb0
> [<ffffffffa002ceac>] ? l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth]
> [<ffffffff8130d91a>] lock_sock_nested+0x8a/0xa0
> [<ffffffffa002ceac>] ? l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth]
> [<ffffffff81051a86>] ? process_one_work+0x126/0x450
> [<ffffffffa002ceac>] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x3c/0xe0 [bluetooth]
> [<ffffffff81051ae4>] process_one_work+0x184/0x450
> [<ffffffff81051a86>] ? process_one_work+0x126/0x450
> [<ffffffffa002ce70>] ? l2cap_security_cfm+0x4e0/0x4e0 [bluetooth]
> [<ffffffff8105276e>] worker_thread+0x15e/0x340
> [<ffffffff81052610>] ? manage_workers+0x110/0x110
> [<ffffffff81057bb6>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
> [<ffffffff813b1ef4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [<ffffffff813af69d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
> [<ffffffff81057b20>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
> [<ffffffff813b1ef0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi>
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 29 +++++++++--------------------
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-21 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-21 22:02 [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix deadlocks with sock lock and L2CAP timers locks Ulisses Furquim
2011-12-21 23:56 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2011-12-22 16:16 ` Gustavo Padovan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1324511784.1965.189.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=padovan@profusion.mobi \
--cc=ulisses@profusion.mobi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).