From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1326966966.1955.3.camel@aeonflux> Subject: Re: [RFCv3 05/34] Bluetooth: Allocate skb depending on sk From: Marcel Holtmann To: Emeltchenko Andrei Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:56:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1326964823-26747-6-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> References: <1326964823-26747-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> <1326964823-26747-6-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Andrei, > Some channels might not have sk so we allocate skbuff directly. > The idea is to use l2cap_chan_send for sending packets not through > sockets. > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko > --- > net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c > index 598805b..bc42ee8 100644 > --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c > +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c > @@ -1531,7 +1531,12 @@ static inline int l2cap_skbuff_fromiovec(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct msghdr > while (len) { > count = min_t(unsigned int, conn->mtu, len); > > - *frag = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err); > + if (sk) > + *frag = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count, > + msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err); > + else > + *frag = bt_skb_alloc(count, GFP_KERNEL); > + > if (!*frag) > return err; > if (memcpy_fromiovec(skb_put(*frag, count), msg->msg_iov, count)) > @@ -1561,8 +1566,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *l2cap_create_connless_pdu(struct l2cap_chan *chan, > BT_DBG("sk %p len %d priority %u", sk, (int)len, priority); > > count = min_t(unsigned int, (conn->mtu - hlen), len); > - skb = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count + hlen, > - msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err); > + > + if (sk) > + skb = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count + hlen, > + msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err); > + else > + skb = bt_skb_alloc(count, GFP_KERNEL); > + > if (!skb) > return ERR_PTR(err); > > @@ -1595,8 +1605,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *l2cap_create_basic_pdu(struct l2cap_chan *chan, > BT_DBG("sk %p len %d", sk, (int)len); > > count = min_t(unsigned int, (conn->mtu - hlen), len); > - skb = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count + hlen, > - msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err); > + > + if (sk) > + skb = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count + hlen, > + msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err); > + else > + skb = bt_skb_alloc(count, GFP_KERNEL); > + > if (!skb) > return ERR_PTR(err); > > @@ -1642,8 +1657,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *l2cap_create_iframe_pdu(struct l2cap_chan *chan, > hlen += L2CAP_FCS_SIZE; > > count = min_t(unsigned int, (conn->mtu - hlen), len); > - skb = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count + hlen, > - msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err); > + > + if (sk) > + skb = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count + hlen, > + msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err); > + else > + skb = bt_skb_alloc(count, GFP_KERNEL); > + > if (!skb) > return ERR_PTR(err); > so I am not sure that I wanna change all these functions this way. It might be a good way of handling this, but I am right now convinced. Care to explain first on how you are using them. Regards Marcel