linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikel Astiz <mikel.astiz.oss@gmail.com>
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mikel Astiz <mikel.astiz@bmw-carit.de>
Subject: [RFC v2 0/2] SSP MITM protection for General Bonding
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:26:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369906016-17006-1-git-send-email-mikel.astiz.oss@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Mikel Astiz <mikel.astiz@bmw-carit.de>

I'm reworking Timo's patch originally submitted as "[RFC] Bluetooth: Fix missing MITM protection when being responding LM".

The proposal is to use MITM protection for General Bonding exactly as for Dedicated Bonding (patch 2/2). I can't think of any reason why the current implementation has different policies, leading to not using MITM protection for General Bonding even if the I/O capabilities make it possible.

The proposal is therefore to make both bonding types equal.

Another alternative would be to toggle this behavior through a mgmt API setting.

Mikel Astiz (1):
  Bluetooth: Use defines instead of integer literals

Timo Mueller (1):
  Bluetooth: Use MITM protection when responding LM

 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.1.4


             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-30  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-30  9:26 Mikel Astiz [this message]
2013-05-30  9:26 ` [RFC v2 1/2] Bluetooth: Use defines instead of integer literals Mikel Astiz
2013-06-13  8:15   ` Johan Hedberg
2013-05-30  9:26 ` [RFC v2 2/2] Bluetooth: Use MITM protection when responding LM Mikel Astiz
2013-06-13  8:32   ` Johan Hedberg
2013-06-17  6:50     ` Mikel Astiz
2013-06-13  8:08 ` [RFC v2 0/2] SSP MITM protection for General Bonding Mikel Astiz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1369906016-17006-1-git-send-email-mikel.astiz.oss@gmail.com \
    --to=mikel.astiz.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikel.astiz@bmw-carit.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).