linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikel Astiz <mikel.astiz.oss@gmail.com>
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Timo Mueller <timo.mueller@bmw-carit.de>,
	Mikel Astiz <mikel.astiz@bmw-carit.de>
Subject: [RFC BlueZ v3 6/8] Bluetooth: Use MITM Protection when IO caps allow it
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:56:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1372409794-24688-7-git-send-email-mikel.astiz.oss@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372409794-24688-1-git-send-email-mikel.astiz.oss@gmail.com>

From: Timo Mueller <timo.mueller@bmw-carit.de>

When responding to a remotely-initiated pairing procedure, a MITM
protected SSP associaton model can be used for pairing if both local
and remote IO capabilities are set to something other than
NoInputNoOutput, regardless of the bonding type (Dedicated or
General).

This was already done for Dedicated Bonding but this patch proposes to
use the same policy for General Bonding as well.

The GAP Specification gives the flexibility to decide whether MITM
Protection is used ot not (Bluetooth Core Specification v4.0 Volume 3,
part C, section 6.5.3).

Note however that the recommendation is *not* to set this flag "unless
the security policy of an available local service requires MITM
Protection" (for both Dedicated and General Bonding). However, the
kernel doesn't necessarily have this information and therefore the
safest choice is to always use MITM Protection, also for General
Bonding.

Signed-off-by: Timo Mueller <timo.mueller@bmw-carit.de>
Signed-off-by: Mikel Astiz <mikel.astiz@bmw-carit.de>
---
 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index 4e5dc5b..283cb3f 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -3028,11 +3028,6 @@ static u8 hci_get_auth_req(struct hci_conn *conn)
 	    conn->remote_auth == HCI_AT_NO_BONDING_MITM)
 		return conn->remote_auth | (conn->auth_type & 0x01);
 
-	/* For general bonding, use the given auth_type */
-	if (conn->remote_auth == HCI_AT_GENERAL_BONDING ||
-	    conn->remote_auth == HCI_AT_GENERAL_BONDING_MITM)
-		return conn->auth_type;
-
 	/* If both remote and local have enough IO capabilities, require
 	 * MITM protection
 	 */
@@ -3040,8 +3035,8 @@ static u8 hci_get_auth_req(struct hci_conn *conn)
 	    conn->io_capability != HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT)
 		return conn->remote_auth | 0x01;
 
-	/* No MITM protection possible so remove requirement */
-	return conn->remote_auth & ~0x01;
+	/* No MITM protection possible so ignore remote requirement */
+	return (conn->remote_auth & ~0x01) | (conn->auth_type & 0x01);
 }
 
 static void hci_io_capa_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
-- 
1.8.1.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-28  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-28  8:56 [RFC BlueZ v3 0/8] SSP MITM protection Mikel Astiz
2013-06-28  8:56 ` [RFC BlueZ v3 1/8] Bluetooth: Add HCI authentication capabilities macros Mikel Astiz
2013-06-28  8:56 ` [RFC BlueZ v3 2/8] Bluetooth: Use defines in in hci_get_auth_req() Mikel Astiz
2013-06-28  8:56 ` [RFC BlueZ v3 3/8] Bluetooth: Use defines instead of integer literals Mikel Astiz
2013-07-09 15:13   ` Gustavo Padovan
2013-06-28  8:56 ` [RFC BlueZ v3 4/8] Bluetooth: Refactor hci_get_auth_req() Mikel Astiz
2013-06-28  8:56 ` [RFC BlueZ v3 5/8] Bluetooth: Refactor code for outgoing dedicated bonding Mikel Astiz
2013-06-28  8:56 ` Mikel Astiz [this message]
2013-06-28  8:56 ` [RFC BlueZ v3 7/8] Bluetooth: Request MITM Protection when initiator Mikel Astiz
2013-06-28  8:56 ` [RFC BlueZ v3 8/8] Bluetooth: Add management command to relax MITM Protection Mikel Astiz
2013-06-28 11:40 ` [RFC BlueZ v3 0/8] SSP MITM protection Mikel Astiz
2013-07-08 11:13   ` Mikel Astiz
2013-07-09 13:32     ` Johan Hedberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1372409794-24688-7-git-send-email-mikel.astiz.oss@gmail.com \
    --to=mikel.astiz.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikel.astiz@bmw-carit.de \
    --cc=timo.mueller@bmw-carit.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).