From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: csonsino <csonsino@gmail.com>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bluetooth: validate BLE connection interval updates
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 15:34:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <138296C5-49FA-475D-9618-FC8D241B8823@holtmann.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9176553-d4d5-c2e0-ecd7-937cac0d8098@gmail.com>
Hi Carey,
> Problem: The Linux bluetooth stack yields complete control over the BLE
> connection interval to the remote device.
>
> The Linux bluetooth stack provides access to the BLE connection interval
> min and max values through /sys/kernel/debug/bluetooth/hci0/
> conn_min_interval and /sys/kernel/debug/bluetooth/hci0/conn_max_interval.
> These values are used for initial BLE connections, but the remote device
> has the ability to request a connection parameter update. In the event
> that the remote side requests to change the connection interval, the Linux
> kernel currently only validates that the desired value is within the
> acceptable range in the bluetooth specification (6 - 3200, corresponding to
> 7.5ms - 4000ms). There is currently no validation that the desired value
> requested by the remote device is within the min/max limits specified in
> the conn_min_interval/conn_max_interval configurations. This essentially
> leads to Linux yielding complete control over the connection interval to
> the remote device.
>
> The proposed patch adds a verification step to the connection parameter
> update mechanism, ensuring that the desired value is within the min/max
> bounds of the current connection. If the desired value is outside of the
> current connection min/max values, then the connection parameter update
> request is rejected and the negative response is returned to the remote
> device. Recall that the initial connection is established using the local
> conn_min_interval/conn_max_interval values, so this allows the Linux
> administrator to retain control over the BLE connection interval.
>
> The one downside that I see is that the current default Linux values for
> conn_min_interval and conn_max_interval typically correspond to 30ms and
> 50ms respectively. If this change were accepted, then it is feasible that
> some devices would no longer be able to negotiate to their desired
> connection interval values. This might be remedied by setting the default
> Linux conn_min_interval and conn_max_interval values to the widest
> supported range (6 - 3200 / 7.5ms - 4000ms). This could lead to the same
> behavior as the current implementation, where the remote device could
> request to change the connection interval value to any value that is
> permitted by the bluetooth specification, and Linux would accept the
> desired value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carey Sonsino <csonsino@gmail.com>
patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-06 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 21:00 [PATCH 1/1] bluetooth: validate BLE connection interval updates csonsino
2019-07-06 13:34 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2019-08-15 8:44 ` Andreas Kemnade
2019-08-19 13:58 ` Carey Sonsino
2019-08-19 16:08 ` Andreas Kemnade
2019-08-19 17:10 ` Carey Sonsino
2019-08-20 6:45 ` Jamie Mccrae
2019-08-20 13:23 ` Carey Sonsino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=138296C5-49FA-475D-9618-FC8D241B8823@holtmann.org \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=csonsino@gmail.com \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox