From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84D8414E2F2 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776286837; cv=none; b=n9UvXXta0tmVhsVez566UA7bGdYxN7KtbKSZM7bSEvkkFve4N47MIoT+5T0mZ11feXPaaF/AultDZvgqxT0Lloodx3YGp8mD4ALKGOMIWukgMTHIIYg5Wppq5I5NGIsT4LDOSgrE4UuA/AUddCwvIiToVxMYaXYiCFzgf6ZtApQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776286837; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cAucEbL91qlooF4omaKpkMfvL4baB6rijq/0ZQOwz3Q=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=X1Ejh+KwymjBMZTBu5woopBqqxCbN1qTCVeqmegLQu1RHciFB8zNksJ5ncDp6qFGDKctrDnMuHQ94swTgfcsk33PdXDrK07cL5WGfIJnk2HMjCodIb2GuhC60obc1rMI7E49+zu/QYU7BippuzjwBuZEIWnLR8NoOdmYpcGGAM0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZrjsRJB3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZrjsRJB3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36431C19424; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:00:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776286837; bh=cAucEbL91qlooF4omaKpkMfvL4baB6rijq/0ZQOwz3Q=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=ZrjsRJB35BiSyZfcJkN/P6edIvS2D0Wxj8TobrGD4WNqdcJYxe47BrgU9a/vFxpbm J90gLfobuZWYR63TTOl30ppuBWwsbnlz+l/VdCqKX62yhgPHff+KqQxwj//OtTX8ZK LlNIxJM73F/HNPpq99R++zOzcps7RMLkx6N2lKGGRbB/Srm7Pg18WTUZPqC1Clnozt Qu8G3eWzxkJ5aGOfQKW1lHWRDo8FmqMyp/slqWGAwkTa0z78Z1St224i9uPg++OA/a LrDndW72F8vzmkDDdH6ifRFTGejR59W+uwUDPAqrnssDJFgUGSHq+GdiAId98houSt TkoVyeJqYeTcA== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E10380A963; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: l2cap: fix MPS check in l2cap_ecred_reconf_req From: patchwork-bot+bluetooth@kernel.org Message-Id: <177628680629.2439002.124743646489985763.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:00:06 +0000 References: <20260415104355.76524-1-phx0fer@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20260415104355.76524-1-phx0fer@gmail.com> To: Dudu Lu Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, marcel@holtmann.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com Hello: This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master) by Luiz Augusto von Dentz : On Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:43:55 +0800 you wrote: > The L2CAP specification states that if more than one channel is being > reconfigured, the MPS shall not be decreased. The current check has > two issues: > > 1) The comparison uses >= (greater-than-or-equal), which incorrectly > rejects reconfiguration requests where the MPS stays the same. > Since the spec says MPS "shall be greater than or equal to the > current MPS", only a strict decrease (remote_mps > mps) should be > rejected. Keeping the same MPS is valid. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - Bluetooth: l2cap: fix MPS check in l2cap_ecred_reconf_req https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/b1de65fd5f81 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html