Linux bluetooth development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+bluetooth@kernel.org
To: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>
Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
	luiz.von.dentz@intel.com, Chris.Lu@mediatek.com,
	Will-CY.Lee@mediatek.com, ss.wu@mediatek.com,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, rafael@rcpassos.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Properly disable remote wakeup for MT7922/MT7925 on Ryzen platform
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 20:30:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178829460590.1836726.11844830813053776119.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902-btmtk-ryzen-remote-wakeup-v3-1-8a733d0edd7c@rong.moe>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>:

On Wed, 02 Sep 2026 02:19:18 +0800 you wrote:
> It is reported that a remote wakeup could cause MT7922/MT7925's btusb
> interface completely unresponsive. Resetting the xHCI root hub doesn't
> help at all, and recovering from such a state needs a power cycle.
> 
> All reports seen to be relevant to Ryzen-based laptops. These NICs are
> usually used as OEM components thanks to some sort of reference designs.
> Their popularity on other platforms is unclear. While there is still a
> chance that the quirk may exist on other platforms, be cautious and only
> apply the quirk to direct children of Ryzen platforms's root hubs for
> the time being. In most cases the root hub is on the SoC or PCH, which
> needs the quirk. Unfortunately, this can't distinguish root hubs on PCIe
> add-in cards. Such roughness should be acceptable, as PCIe USB
> controller add-in cards are less commonly used nowadays. On the other
> hand, applying the quirk doesn't hurt any functionalities either, as the
> device can still be used as a wakeup source if desired. Theoretically,
> we could retrieve the root hub's PCI vendor ID with some hierarchy
> magic, but that's too intrusive...
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3] Bluetooth: Properly disable remote wakeup for MT7922/MT7925 on Ryzen platform
    https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/512bf4484766

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01 18:19 [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Properly disable remote wakeup for MT7922/MT7925 on Ryzen platform Rong Zhang
2026-09-01 20:09 ` [v3] " bluez.test.bot
2026-09-01 20:30 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178829460590.1836726.11844830813053776119.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+bluetooth@kernel.org \
    --cc=Chris.Lu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Will-CY.Lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=i@rong.moe \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=luiz.von.dentz@intel.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@rcpassos.me \
    --cc=ss.wu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox