From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:21:00 -0800 From: John McCorquodale To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: John McCorquodale , BlueZ Mailing List Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Socket G card newbie Q Message-ID: <20040308002100.GA19049@viz.cacr.caltech.edu> References: <20040307214224.GB18481@viz.cacr.caltech.edu> <1078704901.15279.6.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1078704901.15279.6.camel@pegasus> List-ID: Marcel> you should use "hciattach ttyS0 bcsp 230400", because the Socket card Marcel> uses the BCSP transport protocol. The other day you said: Marcel> The Socket 2.5 generation (also know as revision G) is a CSR based Marcel> serial Bluetooth card. Look at the archives for more details. And the list seems to indicate that the F card is BCSP and the G card is CSR. That said, using bcsp yields: $ hciattach ttyS0 bcsp 230400 BCSP initialization timed out Am I mistaken about the F/G distinction? Am I correct in using the normal serial_cs driver in the PCMCIA cardmgr? Is there something I can run directly at the serial port that will give me a more verbose dialog than "initialization timed out", which might indicate some level of partial success? Could it be that there's a new G card series out there -- these are brand spankin' new cards? Cheers, and thanks, -mcq