public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas A. Preyss" <nalp@gmx.net>
To: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Questions about BlueZ in  commercial use
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:34:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040627203414.GB26191@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088363397.3774.64.camel@pegasus>

On  0, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
> > I wouldn't consider 2.6. as stable. And i think it is not recommend to
> > use anything related to USB with 2.6. in a commercial standalone device.
> 
> the Linux kernel 2.6 itself first will become mature if Andrew takes
> over the maintainer role and the 2.7 branch is created. However the
> kernel itself is stable and the BlueZ core is also stable. The USB
> problem you are talking about is a driver problem (hci_usb) only and
> don't effect the BlueZ core.

I wasn't referring to the bluez code, but about the whole 2.6 kernel.
And nowadays USB is going to be the standard for connecting even
internal devices, so the OP should be clear that using the 2.6 kernel is
no smart idea. Because these really heavy problems of the whole USB
subsystem affect the use of bluetooth usb dongles i mentioned it. I
think it isn't a good idea too use USB at all.  
 
> This is a another nice point why I don't really wanna start thinking in
> black/white or stable/testing categories. Choose what you need and then
> you can start talking about how stable this will be for a specific use
> case.

I agree with you, the seperation of stable/testing trees is not the
perfect solution. 
But you have to admit, that yours is a more error-prone approach then 
forking a stable branch and backporting bugfixes. Technically seen, it
is the same as fixing the core and do larger modifications and feature
adds to modules only. But i think this makes quality assurance more
complicated. 
The debian project shows that if you really want such high quality
standards for use in embedded devices e.g. it is possible to keep your
own stable branch. I think it is very easy with a good Changelog.

nicholas


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-27 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-27  9:47 [Bluez-devel] Questions about BlueZ in commercial use KeiHachi
2004-06-27 12:52 ` Nicholas A. Preyss
2004-06-27 14:45   ` KeiHachi
2004-06-27 17:13     ` Nicholas A. Preyss
2004-06-28 16:30       ` KeiHachi
2004-06-28 17:22         ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-27 18:29     ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-28 16:33       ` KeiHachi
2004-06-28 17:45         ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-28 14:39   ` Ademar de Souza Reis Jr.
2004-06-28 14:48     ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-28 15:19       ` Ademar de Souza Reis Jr.
2004-06-28 15:38         ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-28 15:59           ` Stephen Crane
2004-06-28 17:06           ` Ademar de Souza Reis Jr.
2004-06-28 17:15             ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-27 18:09 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-27 19:10   ` Nicholas A. Preyss
2004-06-27 19:09     ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-27 20:34       ` Nicholas A. Preyss [this message]
2004-06-27 20:49         ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-27 21:42           ` Nicholas A. Preyss
2004-06-28  7:37             ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-28 16:28   ` KeiHachi
2004-06-28 17:13     ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-29 17:08       ` KeiHachi
2004-06-29 17:41         ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-30 16:22           ` KeiHachi
2004-06-30 18:11             ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-07-04  8:57               ` KeiHachi
2004-07-04 11:38                 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-07-04 13:19                   ` Peter Favrholdt
2004-07-04 13:47                     ` Marcel Holtmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040627203414.GB26191@gmx.net \
    --to=nalp@gmx.net \
    --cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox