From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:23:17 +1000 From: James Cameron To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: BlueZ Mailing List Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] pand/main.c, restore signals for dev-up script Message-ID: <20040629052317.GQ20139@hp.com> References: <20040628085356.GA8871@hp.com> <1088413518.3774.167.camel@pegasus> <20040628095541.GB8871@hp.com> <1088417629.3774.177.camel@pegasus> <20040628101927.GC8871@hp.com> <1088419197.3774.183.camel@pegasus> <20040628120612.GF8871@hp.com> <1088427271.3774.198.camel@pegasus> <20040628224803.GA20139@hp.com> <1088465177.6030.221.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1088465177.6030.221.camel@pegasus> Sender: james.cameron@hp.com List-ID: On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 01:26:17AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > from my view it is better to use "net.agent" and "pand -l" for this job. Yes, I know. I don't know why you think that though, since using dev-up costs less in dependencies and execution time. You've proposed removing dev-up on the grounds that I had problems with it, and that you've never used it; which suggests that you think that cost of maintenance is more critical. I'm just guessing. > If it gets to complex then you should integrate it directly into pand. dev-up is integrated directly into pand. ;-) -- James Cameron