From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Mathias Adam To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Once again: Socket CF card and Kernel 2.6 Message-ID: <20050306193724.GA17819@adamis.de> References: <20050226031901.GL11723@adamis.de> <1109578431.17256.9.camel@pegasus> <20050228220209.GA8151@adamis.de> <1109665776.17256.122.camel@pegasus> <42294598.6010004@adamis.de> <1110021859.8058.111.camel@pegasus> <20050305141858.GA21208@adamis.de> <1110046671.18555.3.camel@pegasus> <20050305192539.GA26285@adamis.de> <1110052537.8302.2.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1110052537.8302.2.camel@pegasus> Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ users List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:37:24 +0100 Hi Marcel, On 05.03.05 20:55:37, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > I get these extra log messages with your patch and the Xircom card: > > ttyS2: autoconf (0x03e8, 0x00000000): iir=3 iir1=6 iir2=6 Xscale type=XScale > ttyS2 at I/O 0x3e8 (irq = 20) is a XScale > ***** Serial: baud=9600 quot=12 > ***** Serial: baud=9600 quot=12 > ***** Serial: baud=9600 quot=12 > ***** Serial: baud=9600 quot=12 > ***** Serial: baud=9600 quot=12 > ***** Serial: baud=9600 quot=12 > ***** Serial: baud=9600 quot=12 > ***** Serial: baud=115200 quot=1 > > Don't ask why the type is now Xscale. It seems it is Xscale for every ^^^ was it different without my patch? Shouldn't be... > serial port in my system and it is a normal P4 system. What kernel version did you patch? What does dmesg show when calling hciattach (should be some ***** Serial messages)? Does the card work with a 2.4 kernel (e.g. 2.4.29)? > > > For the Socket card the baud rate is 230400 and yes, this is to slow for > > > the full bandwith of a piconet. However I never did any bandwith test > > > with this card, but actually there are cards out there where the UART > > > limits the total possible bandwidth. > > > > Huh - but at least it's still a lot faster than a GPRS connection so it's > > okay for me... > > If you have another system with an USB Bluetooth dongle, you can simply > check what's the max piconet bandwidth. Use a PAN connection or test it > with the l2test or rctest program. I didn't find l2test nor rctest but I tried some OBEX file transfers and only got around 25-30 KiByte/s, the same with Windows so it seems the card really is limited to 230400 baud... Btw, do you know another cf card without external antenna? Regards, Mathias -- There are only 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary, and those who don't. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users