Re: [Bluez-devel] Bluez without libbluez?

[Fred Schaettgen <bluez-devel@schaettgen.de>]

On Friday, 15. July 2005 21:38, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
=2E..
> As a side note, I'm wondering how libkdebluetooth and Gnome's libbtctl
> can claim that they're LGPL while linking to libbluez.

libkbluetooth is GPLed or did I miss something?
libqobex on the other hand is in fact LGPLed. But libqobex alone as source=
=20
does not derive from or use the BlueZ libs. It does once you compile it,=20
which means that the resulting programs must be GPLed. Which they are. And=
=20
besides that I won=C2=B4t care about such details unless as german court co=
mmented=20
on these linking issues. The outcome will be like throwing a dice anyway.

=46red

=2D-=20
=46red Schaettgen
bluez-devel@schaettgen.de


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel