From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <20060719085107.34521.qmail@web15806.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:51:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Mingfan lu To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Bluez-devel] About the transfering speed of bluez RFCOMM socket Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0168947832==" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net --===============0168947832== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1546605997-1153299067=:32686" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --0-1546605997-1153299067=:32686 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Env: Machine A and machine B are the same. But suse10.1 for A ---bluez windowsXP(SP2) for B ---bluesoleil We use the same bluetooth dongle and mobile device(symbian) in the test. When I use OpenObex(based on bluez Rfcomm socket) to send a file from machieA to the mobile device the transfering speed is about 10K BytePerSec. When I use Bluesoleil to send the same file from machine B to the mobile device the transfering speed is about 40K-50K BytePerSec. Why is B much better than A? is it not efficient of Bluez Rfcomm socket? or other reason. With respects, Mingfan.Lu --------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. --0-1546605997-1153299067=:32686 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Env:
Machine A and machine B are the same.
But
suse10.1 for A   ---bluez
windowsXP(SP2) for B ---bluesoleil
We use the same bluetooth dongle and mobile device(symbian) in the test.
When I use OpenObex(based on bluez Rfcomm socket) to send a file from machieA to the mobile device the transfering speed is about 10K BytePerSec.
When I use Bluesoleil to send the same file from machine B to the mobile device the transfering speed is about 40K-50K BytePerSec.
 
Why is  B much better than A?
is it not efficient of Bluez Rfcomm socket? or other reason.


With respects,
      Mingfan.Lu

How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. --0-1546605997-1153299067=:32686-- --===============0168947832== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV --===============0168947832== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel --===============0168947832==--