Re: [rfc]btusb with SCO support

Oliver Neukum
2008-08-04T18:32:47Z

Am Montag 04 August 2008 19:25:17 schrieb Marcel Holtmann:
> Hi Oliver,
>=20
> >>> Then why do you implement this option for hci_usb?
> >>> And why can the other IGNORE options be overridden?
> >>
> >> if I wanna use the generic Bluetooth descriptor for matching, I =20
> >> need a
> >> way to mark broken devices as to be ignored. Otherwise I would have a
> >> really long list of matching vendor and product ids.
> >
> > True, but if btusb is to replace hci_usb, the module options should =20
> > match.
> > So will you remove that option in hci_usb?
>=20
> the override_ignore is your invention. So what do you mean?

Hm, I may be smoking strange kernels, but I copied this as far as I can tell
from 2.6.25 hci_usb and merely renamed it because "ignore" seemed too
generic to me. Could you check we are talking about the same parameter?

Gru=DF
Oliver