Re: [rfc]btusb with SCO support

Alan Stern
2008-08-02T23:47:50Z

On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Marcel Holtmann wrote:

> Question is if selecting the 2nd alternate setting and not submitting
> the URBs for it is a good idea or if that will still consume bandwidth
> and power. And thus it would be better to use the first alternate
> setting that is meant for the case with no SCO connections.

Installing the second altsetting and not submitting URBs will not
consume bandwidth. It may consume a little power, but probably not
much more than just using the first altsetting.

Alan Stern