Re: [rfc]btusb with SCO support

Alan Stern
2008-08-19T18:57:23Z

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Marcel Holtmann wrote:

> Our problem is only that we are using a workqueue and can't make any
> assumption when we get scheduled. This is obviously not perfect, but it
> seems there is nothing much that can be done.
>
> I think the specification is simply bad and we have to live with it.

I guess so.

Since these are isoc URBs anyway, shouldn't you simply drop them until
the new altsetting is ready? That's a lot easier than trying to keep
track of them and deferring them (which doesn't make much sense for
Isochronous data).

Alan Stern