* bluez-hcidump-1.42 fails to build against bluez-4.61
@ 2010-03-05 18:48 Pacho Ramos
2010-03-05 19:30 ` Stefan Seyfried
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2010-03-05 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 271 bytes --]
This is for recovering:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/4619
since more users are getting this problem and I would like to know if
patches provided in that thread can be used and accepted by upstream or
they are not good enough.
Thanks a lot
[-- Attachment #2: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bluez-hcidump-1.42 fails to build against bluez-4.61
2010-03-05 18:48 bluez-hcidump-1.42 fails to build against bluez-4.61 Pacho Ramos
@ 2010-03-05 19:30 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-03-07 21:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Seyfried @ 2010-03-05 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pacho; +Cc: linux-bluetooth
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:48:42 +0100
Pacho Ramos <pacho@condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es> wrote:
> This is for recovering:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/4619
>
> since more users are getting this problem and I would like to know if
> patches provided in that thread can be used and accepted by upstream or
> they are not good enough.
In case they only got overlooked, I can of course resend them.
If they are not good enough, mentioning the problems might be
helpful, so that I can do something about it ;)
Have fun,
seife
--
Stefan Seyfried
"Any ideas, John?"
"Well, surrounding them's out."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bluez-hcidump-1.42 fails to build against bluez-4.61
2010-03-05 19:30 ` Stefan Seyfried
@ 2010-03-07 21:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-03-08 13:56 ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2010-03-07 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Seyfried; +Cc: pacho, linux-bluetooth
Hi Stefan,
> > This is for recovering:
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/4619
> >
> > since more users are getting this problem and I would like to know if
> > patches provided in that thread can be used and accepted by upstream or
> > they are not good enough.
>
> In case they only got overlooked, I can of course resend them.
>
> If they are not good enough, mentioning the problems might be
> helpful, so that I can do something about it ;)
they didn't get overlooked. It was my mistake that I broke hcidump and I
now put everything back in the library. So 4.62 should fix it. I was
under the assumption that nothing ever used these symbols, but as it
seems I was clearly wrong. Sorry about that.
Regards
Marcel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bluez-hcidump-1.42 fails to build against bluez-4.61
2010-03-07 21:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
@ 2010-03-08 13:56 ` Pacho Ramos
2010-03-08 14:05 ` Stefan Seyfried
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2010-03-08 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcel Holtmann; +Cc: Stefan Seyfried, linux-bluetooth
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1058 bytes --]
El dom, 07-03-2010 a las 13:43 -0800, Marcel Holtmann escribió:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> > > This is for recovering:
> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/4619
> > >
> > > since more users are getting this problem and I would like to know if
> > > patches provided in that thread can be used and accepted by upstream or
> > > they are not good enough.
> >
> > In case they only got overlooked, I can of course resend them.
> >
> > If they are not good enough, mentioning the problems might be
> > helpful, so that I can do something about it ;)
>
> they didn't get overlooked. It was my mistake that I broke hcidump and I
> now put everything back in the library. So 4.62 should fix it. I was
> under the assumption that nothing ever used these symbols, but as it
> seems I was clearly wrong. Sorry about that.
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
>
We should then simply wait for bluez-4.62 and, then, no patches would be
needed for bluez-hcidump, not? (or I have missed anything?)
Thanks a lot and best regards :-)
[-- Attachment #2: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bluez-hcidump-1.42 fails to build against bluez-4.61
2010-03-08 13:56 ` Pacho Ramos
@ 2010-03-08 14:05 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-03-08 14:36 ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Seyfried @ 2010-03-08 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pacho; +Cc: linux-bluetooth
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:56:54 +0100
Pacho Ramos <pacho@condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es> wrote:
> We should then simply wait for bluez-4.62 and, then, no patches would be
> needed for bluez-hcidump, not? (or I have missed anything?)
Yes, I verified this already: after I had updated bluez to 4.62 in the
openSUSE buildservice, I could safely drop the two patches from the
bluez-hcidump package and it still builds fine.
--
Stefan Seyfried
"Any ideas, John?"
"Well, surrounding them's out."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bluez-hcidump-1.42 fails to build against bluez-4.61
2010-03-08 14:05 ` Stefan Seyfried
@ 2010-03-08 14:36 ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2010-03-08 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Seyfried; +Cc: linux-bluetooth
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 631 bytes --]
El lun, 08-03-2010 a las 15:05 +0100, Stefan Seyfried escribió:
> On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:56:54 +0100
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es> wrote:
>
> > We should then simply wait for bluez-4.62 and, then, no patches would be
> > needed for bluez-hcidump, not? (or I have missed anything?)
>
> Yes, I verified this already: after I had updated bluez to 4.62 in the
> openSUSE buildservice, I could safely drop the two patches from the
> bluez-hcidump package and it still builds fine.
Yes, I have just confirmed it, sorry for the inconvenience, I didn't
notice 4.62 was already released
Thanks a lot
[-- Attachment #2: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-08 14:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-05 18:48 bluez-hcidump-1.42 fails to build against bluez-4.61 Pacho Ramos
2010-03-05 19:30 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-03-07 21:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-03-08 13:56 ` Pacho Ramos
2010-03-08 14:05 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-03-08 14:36 ` Pacho Ramos
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).