From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:40:18 -0300 From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" To: Anderson Lizardo Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Move bit-field var to data->flags Message-ID: <20100719184017.GA13327@vigoh> References: <1279311633-12131-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Anderson, * Anderson Lizardo [2010-07-19 13:19:52 -0400]: > Hi Gustavo, > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote: > > @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ static void btusb_work(struct work_struct *work) > >        int err; > > > >        if (hdev->conn_hash.sco_num > 0) { > > -               if (!data->did_iso_resume) { > > +               if (!test_bit(BTUSB_DID_ISO_RESUME, &data->flags)) { > >                        err = usb_autopm_get_interface(data->isoc); > >                        if (err < 0) { > >                                clear_bit(BTUSB_ISOC_RUNNING, &data->flags); > > @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static void btusb_work(struct work_struct *work) > >                                return; > >                        } > > > > -                       data->did_iso_resume = 1; > > +                       set_bit(BTUSB_DID_ISO_RESUME, &data->flags); > >                } > >                if (data->isoc_altsetting != 2) { > >                        clear_bit(BTUSB_ISOC_RUNNING, &data->flags); > > Just wondering ... could test_and_set_bit() be used here (instead of > test_bit() + set_bit()) ? No, because usb_autopm_get_interface() can return a error. In that case we shall not set the bit. -- Gustavo F. Padovan http://padovan.org