linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 3/6] Bluetooth: Implement the first SMP commands
@ 2010-10-22 23:56 Anderson Briglia
  2010-10-25 13:03 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anderson Briglia @ 2010-10-22 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-bluetooth; +Cc: Vinicius Costa Gomes

From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>

These simple commands will allow the SMP procedure to be started
and terminated with a not supported error. This is the first step
toward something useful.

Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
---
 net/bluetooth/l2cap.c |  117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
index 1ac44f4..ba87c84 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
 #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
 #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
 #include <net/bluetooth/l2cap.h>
+#include <net/bluetooth/smp.h>
 
 #define VERSION "2.15"
 
@@ -307,6 +308,85 @@ static void l2cap_chan_del(struct sock *sk, int err)
 	}
 }
 
+static struct sk_buff *smp_build_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code,
+							u16 dlen, void *data)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	struct l2cap_hdr *lh;
+	int len;
+
+	len = L2CAP_HDR_SIZE + 1 + dlen;
+
+	if (len > conn->mtu)
+		return NULL;
+
+	skb = bt_skb_alloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!skb)
+		return NULL;
+
+	lh = (struct l2cap_hdr *) skb_put(skb, L2CAP_HDR_SIZE);
+	lh->len = cpu_to_le16(1 + dlen);
+	lh->cid = cpu_to_le16(L2CAP_CID_SMP);
+
+	memcpy(skb_put(skb, 1), &code, 1);
+
+	memcpy(skb_put(skb, dlen), data, dlen);
+
+	return skb;
+}
+
+static inline void smp_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code, u16 len, void *data)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb = smp_build_cmd(conn, code, len, data);
+
+	BT_DBG("code 0x%2.2x", code);
+
+	if (!skb)
+		return;
+
+	hci_send_acl(conn->hcon, skb, 0);
+}
+
+static int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level)
+{
+	__u8 authreq;
+
+	BT_DBG("conn %p hcon %p level 0x%2.2x", conn, conn->hcon, sec_level);
+
+	switch (sec_level) {
+	case BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM:
+		/* Encrypted, no MITM protection */
+		authreq = 0x01;
+		break;
+
+	case BT_SECURITY_HIGH:
+		/* Bonding, MITM protection */
+		authreq = 0x05;
+		break;
+
+	case BT_SECURITY_LOW:
+	default:
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	if (conn->hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) {
+		struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
+		cp.io_capability = 0x00;
+		cp.oob_flag = 0x00;
+		cp.max_key_size = 16;
+		cp.init_key_dist = 0x00;
+		cp.resp_key_dist = 0x00;
+		cp.auth_req = authreq;
+		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
+	} else {
+		struct smp_cmd_security_req cp;
+		cp.auth_req = authreq;
+		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* Service level security */
 static inline int l2cap_check_security(struct sock *sk)
 {
@@ -4562,6 +4642,43 @@ done:
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline void smp_sig_channel(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u8 code = skb->data[0];
+	__u8 reason;
+
+	skb_pull(skb, 1);
+
+	switch (code) {
+	case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ:
+		reason = SMP_PAIRING_NOTSUPP;
+		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_FAIL, 1, &reason);
+		l2cap_conn_del(conn->hcon, 0x05);
+		break;
+
+	case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_FAIL:
+		break;
+
+	case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP:
+	case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM:
+	case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM:
+	case SMP_CMD_ENCRYPT_INFO:
+	case SMP_CMD_MASTER_IDENT:
+	case SMP_CMD_IDENT_INFO:
+	case SMP_CMD_IDENT_ADDR_INFO:
+	case SMP_CMD_SIGN_INFO:
+	case SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ:
+	default:
+		BT_DBG("Unknown command code 0x%2.2x", code);
+
+		reason = SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
+		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_FAIL, 1, &reason);
+		l2cap_conn_del(conn->hcon, 0x05);
+	}
+
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+}
+
 static void l2cap_recv_frame(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct l2cap_hdr *lh = (void *) skb->data;
-- 
1.7.0.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/6] Bluetooth: Implement the first SMP commands
  2010-10-22 23:56 [PATCH 3/6] Bluetooth: Implement the first SMP commands Anderson Briglia
@ 2010-10-25 13:03 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
  2010-10-26  9:26   ` Ville Tervo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo F. Padovan @ 2010-10-25 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anderson Briglia; +Cc: linux-bluetooth, Vinicius Costa Gomes

Hi Vinicius,

* Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@openbossa.org> [2010-10-22 19:56:57 -0400]:

> From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
> 
> These simple commands will allow the SMP procedure to be started
> and terminated with a not supported error. This is the first step
> toward something useful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
> ---
>  net/bluetooth/l2cap.c |  117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> index 1ac44f4..ba87c84 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
>  #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
>  #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
>  #include <net/bluetooth/l2cap.h>
> +#include <net/bluetooth/smp.h>
>  
>  #define VERSION "2.15"
>  
> @@ -307,6 +308,85 @@ static void l2cap_chan_del(struct sock *sk, int err)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static struct sk_buff *smp_build_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code,
> +							u16 dlen, void *data)

Call this l2cap_smp_build_cmd()

> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	struct l2cap_hdr *lh;
> +	int len;
> +
> +	len = L2CAP_HDR_SIZE + 1 + dlen;
> +
> +	if (len > conn->mtu)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	skb = bt_skb_alloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	if (!skb)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	lh = (struct l2cap_hdr *) skb_put(skb, L2CAP_HDR_SIZE);
> +	lh->len = cpu_to_le16(1 + dlen);

cpu_to_le16(len - L2CAP_HDR_SIZE) here

> +	lh->cid = cpu_to_le16(L2CAP_CID_SMP);
> +
> +	memcpy(skb_put(skb, 1), &code, 1);
> +
> +	memcpy(skb_put(skb, dlen), data, dlen);
> +
> +	return skb;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void smp_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code, u16 len, void *data)

and this l2cap_smp_send_cmd.

> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb = smp_build_cmd(conn, code, len, data);
> +
> +	BT_DBG("code 0x%2.2x", code);
> +
> +	if (!skb)
> +		return;
> +
> +	hci_send_acl(conn->hcon, skb, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level)
> +{


l2cap_smp_conn_security() here.

> +	__u8 authreq;
> +
> +	BT_DBG("conn %p hcon %p level 0x%2.2x", conn, conn->hcon, sec_level);
> +
> +	switch (sec_level) {
> +	case BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM:
> +		/* Encrypted, no MITM protection */
> +		authreq = 0x01;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case BT_SECURITY_HIGH:
> +		/* Bonding, MITM protection */
> +		authreq = 0x05;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case BT_SECURITY_LOW:
> +	default:
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (conn->hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) {
> +		struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
> +		cp.io_capability = 0x00;
> +		cp.oob_flag = 0x00;
> +		cp.max_key_size = 16;
> +		cp.init_key_dist = 0x00;
> +		cp.resp_key_dist = 0x00;
> +		cp.auth_req = authreq;
> +		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> +	} else {
> +		struct smp_cmd_security_req cp;
> +		cp.auth_req = authreq;
> +		smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /* Service level security */
>  static inline int l2cap_check_security(struct sock *sk)
>  {
> @@ -4562,6 +4642,43 @@ done:
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void smp_sig_channel(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)

l2cap_smp_sig_channel()

-- 
Gustavo F. Padovan
ProFUSION embedded systems - http://profusion.mobi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/6] Bluetooth: Implement the first SMP commands
  2010-10-25 13:03 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
@ 2010-10-26  9:26   ` Ville Tervo
  2010-10-26 15:22     ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ville Tervo @ 2010-10-26  9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ext Gustavo F. Padovan
  Cc: Anderson Briglia, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	Vinicius Costa Gomes

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 03:03:56PM +0200, ext Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> Hi Vinicius,
> 
> * Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@openbossa.org> [2010-10-22 19:56:57 -0400]:
> 
> > From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
> > 
> > These simple commands will allow the SMP procedure to be started
> > and terminated with a not supported error. This is the first step
> > toward something useful.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
> > ---
> >  net/bluetooth/l2cap.c |  117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> > index 1ac44f4..ba87c84 100644
> > --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> >  #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
> >  #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
> >  #include <net/bluetooth/l2cap.h>
> > +#include <net/bluetooth/smp.h>
> >  
> >  #define VERSION "2.15"
> >  
> > @@ -307,6 +308,85 @@ static void l2cap_chan_del(struct sock *sk, int err)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +static struct sk_buff *smp_build_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code,
> > +							u16 dlen, void *data)
> 
> Call this l2cap_smp_build_cmd()

Should the whole smp stuff be in separate file (smp.c)? It's not a l2cap feature but a
protocol using l2cap. In that case smp_build_cmd would be good name.

-- 
Ville

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/6] Bluetooth: Implement the first SMP commands
  2010-10-26  9:26   ` Ville Tervo
@ 2010-10-26 15:22     ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
  2010-10-28  9:17       ` Gustavo F. Padovan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz @ 2010-10-26 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ville Tervo
  Cc: ext Gustavo F. Padovan, Anderson Briglia,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Vinicius Costa Gomes

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Ville Tervo <ville.tervo@nokia.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 03:03:56PM +0200, ext Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
>> Hi Vinicius,
>>
>> * Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@openbossa.org> [2010-10-22 19:56:57 -0400]:
>>
>> > From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
>> >
>> > These simple commands will allow the SMP procedure to be started
>> > and terminated with a not supported error. This is the first step
>> > toward something useful.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
>> > ---
>> >  net/bluetooth/l2cap.c |  117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
>> > index 1ac44f4..ba87c84 100644
>> > --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
>> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
>> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
>> >  #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
>> >  #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
>> >  #include <net/bluetooth/l2cap.h>
>> > +#include <net/bluetooth/smp.h>
>> >
>> >  #define VERSION "2.15"
>> >
>> > @@ -307,6 +308,85 @@ static void l2cap_chan_del(struct sock *sk, int err)
>> >     }
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +static struct sk_buff *smp_build_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code,
>> > +                                                   u16 dlen, void *data)
>>
>> Call this l2cap_smp_build_cmd()
>
> Should the whole smp stuff be in separate file (smp.c)? It's not a l2cap feature but a
> protocol using l2cap. In that case smp_build_cmd would be good name.

+1

It is also much better for maintenance and development since there is
less patches touching the l2cap.c so less chances of conflicts,
rebases and regressions on l2cap.


-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Computer Engineer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/6] Bluetooth: Implement the first SMP commands
  2010-10-26 15:22     ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
@ 2010-10-28  9:17       ` Gustavo F. Padovan
  2010-10-29 20:28         ` Anderson Lizardo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo F. Padovan @ 2010-10-28  9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz
  Cc: Ville Tervo, Anderson Briglia, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	Vinicius Costa Gomes

* Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com> [2010-10-26 08:22:16 -0700]:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Ville Tervo <ville.tervo@nokia.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 03:03:56PM +0200, ext Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> >> Hi Vinicius,
> >>
> >> * Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@openbossa.org> [2010-10-22 19:56:57 -0400]:
> >>
> >> > From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
> >> >
> >> > These simple commands will allow the SMP procedure to be started
> >> > and terminated with a not supported error. This is the first step
> >> > toward something useful.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
> >> > ---
> >> >  net/bluetooth/l2cap.c |  117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> >> > index 1ac44f4..ba87c84 100644
> >> > --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> >> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> >> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> >> >  #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
> >> >  #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
> >> >  #include <net/bluetooth/l2cap.h>
> >> > +#include <net/bluetooth/smp.h>
> >> >
> >> >  #define VERSION "2.15"
> >> >
> >> > @@ -307,6 +308,85 @@ static void l2cap_chan_del(struct sock *sk, int err)
> >> >     }
> >> >  }
> >> >
> >> > +static struct sk_buff *smp_build_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code,
> >> > +                                                   u16 dlen, void *data)
> >>
> >> Call this l2cap_smp_build_cmd()
> >
> > Should the whole smp stuff be in separate file (smp.c)? It's not a l2cap feature but a
> > protocol using l2cap. In that case smp_build_cmd would be good name.
> 
> +1
> 
> It is also much better for maintenance and development since there is
> less patches touching the l2cap.c so less chances of conflicts,
> rebases and regressions on l2cap.

Yep, we may need a new smp.c file.

-- 
Gustavo F. Padovan
ProFUSION embedded systems - http://profusion.mobi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/6] Bluetooth: Implement the first SMP commands
  2010-10-28  9:17       ` Gustavo F. Padovan
@ 2010-10-29 20:28         ` Anderson Lizardo
  2010-10-29 20:45           ` Gustavo F. Padovan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anderson Lizardo @ 2010-10-29 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo F. Padovan
  Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Ville Tervo, Anderson Briglia,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Vinicius Costa Gomes

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Gustavo F. Padovan
<padovan@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> Yep, we may need a new smp.c file.

It seems that to support multiple C files, there should not be a .c
file with the same basename as the final module. This means we would
need to rename l2cap.c to something else.

Gustavo, I remember you had some patches to split l2cap.c... Do you
still intend to apply them? If so, having a separate "smp.c" file will
be much easier.

For now, in our branch we renamed "l2cap.c" to "l2cap_core.c" and
added the following to net/bluetooth/Makefile:

l2cap-objs := l2cap_core.o smp.o

Regards,
-- 
Anderson Lizardo
OpenBossa Labs - INdT
Manaus - Brazil

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/6] Bluetooth: Implement the first SMP commands
  2010-10-29 20:28         ` Anderson Lizardo
@ 2010-10-29 20:45           ` Gustavo F. Padovan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo F. Padovan @ 2010-10-29 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anderson Lizardo
  Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Ville Tervo, Anderson Briglia,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Vinicius Costa Gomes

Hi Anderson,

* Anderson Lizardo <anderson.lizardo@openbossa.org> [2010-10-29 16:28:32 -0400]:

> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Gustavo F. Padovan
> <padovan@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> > Yep, we may need a new smp.c file.
> 
> It seems that to support multiple C files, there should not be a .c
> file with the same basename as the final module. This means we would
> need to rename l2cap.c to something else.
> 
> Gustavo, I remember you had some patches to split l2cap.c... Do you
> still intend to apply them? If so, having a separate "smp.c" file will
> be much easier.

Yes, but I still have to discuss one part of the patch with Marcel.

> 
> For now, in our branch we renamed "l2cap.c" to "l2cap_core.c" and
> added the following to net/bluetooth/Makefile:

I'm fine with it, that would done anyway in the future.

-- 
Gustavo F. Padovan
ProFUSION embedded systems - http://profusion.mobi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-29 20:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-22 23:56 [PATCH 3/6] Bluetooth: Implement the first SMP commands Anderson Briglia
2010-10-25 13:03 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-10-26  9:26   ` Ville Tervo
2010-10-26 15:22     ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2010-10-28  9:17       ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-10-29 20:28         ` Anderson Lizardo
2010-10-29 20:45           ` Gustavo F. Padovan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).