linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
Cc: "Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl" <pghatwork@gmail.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linus.walleij@stericsson.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mfd: Add UART support for the ST-Ericsson CG2900.
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:49:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012061549.01534.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=V+89hmBP8iqz13xMhYVfnBkbiVnk=FY=OBE8T@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday 06 December 2010, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> > As a quick answer to your question: that would depend on the
> > difference between the different controllers, I guess. But CG2900
> > doesn't support the LL protocol so it is not an issue for that.
> 
> Right, but if you are only aiming cg2000, why would you create a
> framework for that?  I initially thought your solution was generic
> enough to handle other "many-in-one" Bluetooth chips but I'm
> completely unsure about that now.

As far as I understand, the point is that it's no longer a 'solution'
at the core, i.e. there is no replacement for hci_ldisc or any
of these, just modules for the additional h4 protocols that don't
have a linux implementation yet.

The patch set that was originally posted here had a new framework,
but after the comments from Alan and me, Par-Gunnar agreed to use
the existing framework instead and extend it in a useful way.
Please read all of the discussion we already had. You made a good
point here, but I fear you had both Par-Gunnar and me confused
because it was a point that already got resolved.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-06 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-22 10:38 [PATCH 5/9] mfd: Add UART support for the ST-Ericsson CG2900 Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-10-22 12:51 ` Alan Cox
2010-10-22 14:54   ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-10-22 15:33     ` Alan Cox
2010-10-28 10:37       ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-10-28 12:22     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-29 11:58       ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-10-29 12:08         ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-10-30  0:09           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-29 16:22         ` Alan Cox
2010-10-30  0:01           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-31 12:04             ` Alan Cox
2010-11-05 17:02               ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-11-05 17:19                 ` Alan Cox
2010-11-08  5:24                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-11 14:28                   ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-11-11 14:40                     ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-11-11 15:12                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-29 11:53   ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-10-29 16:24     ` Alan Cox
2010-12-03  9:16       ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-12-03 11:42         ` Vitaly Wool
2010-12-06  9:06           ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-12-06  9:46             ` Vitaly Wool
2010-12-06 12:01               ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-12-06 12:25                 ` Vitaly Wool
2010-12-06 14:49                   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-12-06 14:57                     ` Vitaly Wool
2010-12-06 14:06               ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-06 14:54                 ` Vitaly Wool
2010-12-06 15:15                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-06 15:28                     ` Vitaly Wool
2010-12-06 16:54                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-06 21:24                         ` Vitaly Wool
2010-12-06 23:07                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-08  7:41                             ` Pavan Savoy
2010-12-08 12:21                               ` Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
2010-12-08 12:51                                 ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201012061549.01534.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=pghatwork@gmail.com \
    --cc=vitalywool@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).